ALEX Salmond has slammed the Australian prime minister's attack on the notion of Scottish independence as "foolish, hypocritical and offensive".
The First Minister spoke out after Tony Abbott became the latest international leader to become involved in the debate. He was quoted as saying it was "hard to see how the world would be helped by an independent Scotland".
Abbott said: "What the Scots do is a matter for the Scots and not for a moment do I presume to tell Scottish voters which way they should vote. But as a friend of Britain, as an observer from afar, it's hard to see how the world would be helped by an independent Scotland.
"I think that the people who would like to see the break-up of the United Kingdom are not the friends of justice, the friends of freedom.
"And the countries that would cheer at the prospect ... are not the countries whose company one would like to keep."
Abbott has connections to David Cameron's key political strategist, Lynton Crosby.
Crosby's business partner Mark Textor, with whom he founded lobbyists Crosby Textor, is the Australian PM's polling guru.
Salmond responded: "Mr Abbott's comments are hypocritical because independence does not seem to have done Australia any harm. They are foolish, actually, because of the way he said it. To say the people of Scotland who supported independence weren't friends of freedom or justice, I mean, the independence process is about freedom and justice."
Salmond said the Australian prime minister was "notoriously gaffe-prone" and he had "put his foot right in it" with his comments.
Meanwhile, shadow international development secretary Jim Murphy played down Abbott's remarks.
The Labour MP, who was campaigning for Better Together in Clydebank, said Australians were "famously outspoken and famously direct".
But Murphy said that "ultimately Scots will make their own decision".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article