Another poll published today suggests growing support for the Yes campaign, but strong public doubts about the Scottish Government's plans for the currency in an independent Scotland.
The ICM poll for Scotland on Sunday shows growth of four percentage points for Yes since last month, while No rose two points, and undecided voters fell seven points.
Of the 14% who were still officially undecided, they told the pollsters they were more likely to vote No by a ratio of 2:1.
When the undecideds were stripped out, the headline figure was Yes 45% (+2) and No 55% (+2).
ICM also asked its sample of 1,005 adults across Scotland what they thought of SNP currency policy: 52% said it was "unconvincing", 26% were convinced, and 22% were undecided.
Writing on the What Scotland Thinks website, polling expert Professor John Curtice, of Strathclyde University, said: "Today's poll puts Yes on 38%, up four points on a month ago.
"No are on 47%, also up on last month but by a more modest two points. Don't Knows (which have tended to be relatively high in ICM's polls) have fallen by no less than seven points from 21% to 14%, suggesting that undecided voters have indeed begun to make up their mind as polling day approaches.
"Once the Don't Knows are excluded the Yes tally stands at 45%, No at 55%, representing a two point swing from No to Yes since last month. A movement of that size is too small for us to be able to rule out the possibility that it has simply occurred by chance, and in any event it simply puts the Yes vote back to where it was in ICM's poll in June.
"Today's poll is thus best regarded as failing to show that No has gained any longer-term advantage from the leaders' debate than as evidence of a renewed swing to Yes."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article