Ministers are hushing up an opinion poll paid for with £50,000 of taxpayers' money that shows a surge in support for Scottish independence, an MP has claimed.
The Scottish National Party's Angus MacNeil (Western Isles) called on the Government to be straight with the public and publish the report.
It is said to have been conducted by Ipsos Mori, and its existence was revealed by Kelly Brown, who sent a letter to a newspaper claiming she worked for the firm and saying the results had not been published because they showed a surge in support for independence.
In the letter, she wrote: "A recent poll commissioned by the Cabinet office was 'buried' as it returned a result which showed the Yes vote was soaring."
Ipsos Mori have declined to comment, other than to tweet that it employs no one by the name of Kelly Brown.
During Deputy Prime Minister's questions in the Commons, Mr MacNeil asked Nick Clegg: "Your Government has actually hushed up an opinion poll from the taxpayers who paid for it at a cost of £50,000.
"The poll reportedly shows a surge in support for Scottish independence.
"Tory and Labour scare stories are not working. There should be no government secrecy. So will you be straight with the public on independence and publish this poll? There's not reason that this should be kept secret."
Mr Clegg replied: "I've learnt to try and be a bit wary about opinion polls.
"The only poll that counts is the poll that's going to happen on September 18 and I very much hope, and I think people even like myself who don't have a vote, those of us south of the border, fervently hope the Scottish people will decide to remain part of the family of nations that makes up the United Kingdom.
"Because there is so much that we can do together that we simply cannot do apart and that's very much the argument that I hope will prevail on September 18."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article