SCOTS LibDem leader Willie Rennie has demonstrated a distinctly illiberal side by reprimanding five members who wrote to The Herald protesting at the decision to deny pro- independence campaigners Yes Scotland a stall at the party's conference.
He wrote to them: "It is a matter of deep regret for me that you have chosen to show me such disrespect in sharing your views with the media without speaking to me first."
One of the five has blogged in response: "When did the Scottish Liberal Democrats become authoritarian?"
Nicola Prigg asks: "Since when does a member of a liberal party have to run things through central office?" adding: "Every single one of us signed it to stick up for liberal, open, pluralistic, democratic principles."
Mr Rennie argued in his letter: "It could have detracted from our messages for the conference. Even without some kind of stunt on the day, their presence would have been a focus for the media. As we don't get many opportunities to promote our own message the last point is important.
"It is the clear wish of members that we promote our vision of a federal UK.
"That is what I want our focus to be on as we unveil the Home Rule Commission Report.
"Whatever our response to their approach, it would have been made into a story by Yes Scotland. A rejection has been portrayed as not democratic.
"An acceptance would be used to indicate growing support for independence in the party."
One liberal blogger responded: "To treat opposition as showing him personal 'disrespect' leaves him in danger of sounding pompous, or at least like a Mafia padrone. Time to cool it, Willie."
Another of the signatories to the letter, Allan Heron, said: "That Willie felt the need to waste his time to get the letters typed and signed, and spent the money on stamps to send them really starts to raise questions about his judgment."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article