SENIOR European Conservatives, including a key ally of Prime Minister David Cameron, have dismissed claims by Jose Manuel Barroso that an independent Scotland could be kept out of the EU.
The Commission president has faced a growing continental backlash since he declared last month that Scottish membership would be "difficult if not impossible".
Now, in a morale-booster for the Yes campaign, Mr Barroso's assertions have come under direct fire from former Czech president Vaclav Klaus and Joelle Garriaud-Maylam, a senior French senator specialising in foreign policy.
Most Brussels watchers believe Mr Barroso's words, on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show, were directed as much at Catalonia - which will hold an unsanctioned vote on independence from Spain later this year - as they were at Scotland.
However, Mr Klaus, speaking at a conference on secession movements in Austria, made it clear he expected Scotland and Catalonia, if they were independent, to stay in the EU.
Answering a question from Professor Charlie Jeffery, of Edinburgh University, Mr Klaus said: "It is arrogant of the EU to say Scotland and Catalonia will not be members."
His words came after another prominent conservative, Mme Garriaud-Maylam, effectively accused the UK and Spain of being behind Mr Barroso's intervention.
Speaking in the French Senate, Mme Garriaud-Maylam said: "The threats formulated by Mr Barroso are inappropriate and the result of Spanish and English pressure. London is increasingly worried. They (the threats) are not credible. If Scotland votes for independence, it will stay in the European Union. It would be in England's interest."
The French Conservative is secretary of the Senate's Foreign Affairs, Defence And Armed Forces commission and was delivering a special statement to parliament on Scotland and the EU.
She stressed that states with their own separatist concerns, such as Spain, Belgium and Italy, would "not seek to facilitate accession, as well demonstrated by Mr Barroso's recent comments".
She added: "Large member states will probably seek to maintain the status quo.
"However, the realism of these declarations should be questioned, given the practical consequences of suspending EU co-operation, which, in this case, has existed for more than 40 years and which Scotland wishes to retain.
"It seems reasonable to think most member states will align their position with London, which has already signalled it would respect the results of the referendum."
Mme Garriaud-Maylam's views tally with those of Scottish expert Professor Michael Keating, who said: "I don't see any political will to exclude Scotland from the EU. It is not in the interests of any of the member states, including the UK and Spain."
EU federalists, such as Commission Vice-President Viviane Reding, another Conservative, have made it clear they do not wish the bloc to "lose territory" because of secession movements.
A spokesman for pro-UK campaign Better Together said the "fundamental question is how would we get back in and on what terms".
He added: "If we do manage to get the approval for our application from all of the EU countries, then there is no doubt that we would have lost our position, through being part of the UK, as one of the most influential countries.
"Only the SNP could possibly think that putting ourselves through all of this just to make ourselves less influential."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article