THE SNP is facing calls to distance itself from the 'Labour for Independence' campaign group after claims it was a sham organisation being used to mislead voters.
It emerged yesterday that many activists and supporters were high-profile SNP members.
Pictures showed the Nationalist leader of East Ayrhsire Council, Douglas Reid, and Greg Hepburn, an official in the SNP's youth wing, campaigning for Labour for Independence.
Three SNP councillors from Midlothian, Owen Thompson, Andrew Coventry and Derek George Rosie, were pictured holding up a Labour for Independence banner. An SNP MSP, Christian Allard, has called himself as a supporter.
Labour for Independence was set up a year ago by a paid-up Labour member, Allan Grogan, an ex-professional wrestler who had the ring name "The Natural".
Scottish Labour deputy leader Anas Sarwar called it a sham. He said: "For prominent MSPs, council leaders and party officials to masquerade as Labour supporters to give a false impression about their campaign is disrespectful to ordinary Scots who want to make a decision on our future based on the facts."
Labour for Independence says it is open to Labour members, supporters, voters and "future members".
An SNP spokesman said: "The Labour for Independence group is organised by members of the Labour Party. Others who support a Yes vote are perfectly entitled to campaign across party boundaries with them, including obviously SNP members."
In a statement, Mr Grogan said: "Membership is open to all who are committed to an independent Scotland and the restoration of a real Labour Party at the heart of it.
"Members cannot belong to a political party other than the Labour Party."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article