YES Scotland last night admitted losing a second member of its self-styled "top team" amid persistent rumours – vehemently denied – of cash problems at the organisation.
The cross-party movement for independence confirmed former RBS manager Jacqueline Caldwell had quit after just six months as its linchpin director of operations.
Caldwell's job description was to lead the day-to-day operations of the Yes campaign and ensure its policies were being implemented and goals achieved.
Since its launch 13 months ago, Yes Scotland has failed to move opinion polls in its favour.
Caldwell was also in charge of budget controls, board meetings and deputising for the chief executive in his absence.
Hired on a two-year contract last September, Caldwell resigned in March, but Yes Scotland did not publicise the fact. The organisation said Caldwell left for personal reasons but refused to elaborate.
Despite Caldwell's pivotal role, her post has not been replaced, and her duties have been shared out among other employees.
Yes Scotland has now lost half of what it called its "top team" of four directors.
Director of communications Susan Stewart left last week in a "streamlining" operation at the campaign's Glasgow HQ. Like Caldwell, she will not be replaced, with Yes Scotland chief executive Blair Jenkins taking a greater role in the media operation.
Director of communities Shirley-Anne Somerville and director of marketing Ian Dommett remain in post.
Announcing Stewart's exit, Yes Scotland said a review of its operating structure had led it to concentrate more resources into local campaigns to achieve a Yes vote next year.
Insiders say this is code for trying to get by with less money than expected. Despite receiving more than £1.6 million in declared donations, several sources in the Yes camp raised finance worries with the Sunday Herald.
A senior SNP source said: "There's no money coming through the door, just dribs and drabs."
The Sunday Herald first revealed financial tensions at Yes Scotland in February, when it emerged that, despite the SNP hinting it would forward two £1m donations, the party had held back most of the money for itself. The SNP ultimately passed on just £342,000 to help Yes Scotland's start-up costs.
Although Yes Scotland had £1.3m in other donations, almost all of this came from five established SNP donors, including £1m from EuroMillions winners Colin and Christine Weir, suggesting a limited donor base.
The pro-Union Better Together campaign has declared £700,000 from various business owners, and claimed to have received £1m more.
Yes Scotland has had significant outlays. Its showpiece office on Hope Street in Glasgow costs more than £70,000 a year to lease, and underwent an expensive fit-out.
It also had an initial outlay on stock for its merchandising operation, but much of what it tries to sell is unusually expensive for a political campaign, including £330 gold cufflinks and £9 reusable hot drink cups. Its best-selling items – pens, badges and stickers – are all £2 or less.
A Yes Scotland spokesman said reports of money problems were a misunderstanding. He added: "Ms Caldwell resigned from Yes Scotland in March this year for personal reasons. Her former role of operations director has not been filled and her duties have been reallocated among other employees."
A Better Together source said: "To lose one director could be put down to bad luck, to lose two could be considered careless. The Yes camp is being asked to do the impossible – sell something to Scots that they don't want. Little wonder people in Hope Street think the time is right to 'consider other opportunities'."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article