Labour's Jim Murphy has suspended his 100 towns in 100 days tour of Scotland for the pro-UK Better Together, blaming the Yes campaign for co-ordinating mobs intimidating his staff and the public.
The East Renfrewshire MP said he was awaiting advice from Police Scotland as well as promises by the hierarchy of the Yes campaign that they would "call off the attack dogs" before restarting the tour.
The decision came less than 24 hours after he was struck by an egg addressing crowds in Kirkcaldy.
Mr Murphy, who claimed he had been challenged to a fight in Aberdeen and described his hecklers as "nationalist mobs", said: "The blame lies at the door of Yes Scotland. They should stop this intimidation."
He insisted his decision to publicise the suspension and show videos of hostile crowds at his shopping precinct debates was "not about showing opponents in the worst possible light".
But he claimed disruption of his events in recent days was being pulled together officially by Yes Scotland, claiming they had in one instance been gathering at the campaign's local headquarters and publicising his tour on Yes Facebook pages.
He added many of those involved in recent disruption of his street meetings, of which more than 80 have been completed, had been following his tour to various stop-offs, putting a total figure of those involved in the hundreds.
Mr Murphy also claimed the antagonism was one-way and that there was no equivalent of such abuse directed against the Yes campaign.
He added: "We are not going to be silenced and intimidated by a noisy nationalist mob."
A spokesperson for Yes Scotland said: "We condemn all forms of abusive, dangerous and offensive behaviour, whether it be Jim Murphy having eggs thrown at him, or Alex Salmond being harassed by a road rage motorist.
"For the most part, the independence debate has been conducted in a responsible, peaceful and enthusiastic manner with only a very small minority on both sides behaving badly. The eyes of the world are on Scotland and it is vital that everybody - regardless of which side of the debate they are on - helps to show off Scotland at its best."
Mr Murphy's announcement came after both David Cameron and Mr Salmond condemned the egg-throwing incident in Kirkcaldy on Thursday and addressed the tension as the countdown to the referendum gathers pace and heat.
Mr Cameron, visting Royal Navy supplier MacTaggart Scott's marine engineering workshop in Loanhead, Midlothian, said: "I think the responsibility for the people doing these things lies with the people doing these things.
"I've always thought that it isn't right to throw eggs at people - I had one myself in Cornwall once, it's an interesting experience - and I'm sure other party leaders would take the same view.
"It's a vigorous debate with lots of argument, there's nothing wrong with a bit of heckling but throwing things isn't necessarily part of the democratic process."
He also commented on claims made to him by companies over the Scottish Government's response to firms that have come out in favour of keeping the United Kingdom together.
"I think it's good that companies are speaking out," he said. "I think some of them have been cautious about speaking out because there have been slightly aggressive tactics.
"That's what I hear, I don't have direct evidence, but a number of businesses have said to me that they are worried about speaking out because you get shouted at down the telephone."
He added: "You do hear a lot of business say that they are frightened of speaking out, because they say that they find the way the Scottish Government behaves can be rather bullying and overbearing.
"I think if that's true it's very regrettable, and I think people should be free to speak out. Certainly businesses that speak out in the other direction haven't had threatening telephone calls from me."
The First Minister echoed his condemnation of the egg-throwing, and said a "road rage" incident, where he was tailed by another motorist waving a No sign at him, was a "very bad example" of what could happen in political campaigns.
But he said no responsible politician should seek to take advantage of such protests, as he insisted that the overwhelming majority of Scots were "enjoying the most invigorating, scintillating, exciting debate in our political history".
After independence campaigners staged a noisy protest outside a Glasgow hotel where Mr Cameron was speaking last night, Mr Salmond stressed the "right of peaceful protest", adding that people were "entitled to demonstrate outside a white tie function, the only safe audience the Prime Minister thinks he has in Scotland".
While he said people had "every entitlement to peaceful protest" he stated: "People shouldn't throw eggs at somebody full stop, that's something that happens in elections. I remember John Prescott getting a bit energised about it in a UK election. It shouldn't happen - I don't think it's at the serious end of things - but it shouldn't happen.
"The road rage incident was a very bad example but I don't make that an issue. I don't make the death threats from a few daft people I've had an issue, because I know know 99.9% of people in Scotland are enjoying and being energised by a wonderful political debate.
"All politicians should beware, yes of course we call for good conduct, on line and off line, yes of course we do. But don't confuse the actions of a few people with the 99.9% of the people of Scotland who are enjoying the most invigorating, scintillating, exciting debate in our political history.
"And don't try to take advantage of an incident, because I certainly wouldn't, and I'm sure no other responsible politician would want to do that."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article