BETTER Together has made an informal complaint to the BBC about the composition of the live audience at Monday's debate between Alex Salmond and Alistair Darling.
A selected cross-section of voters was invited to watch the campaign figureheads go head-to-head at Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum.
But the 200-strong audience appeared more sympathetic to Mr Salmond, giving the First Minister vociferous support at every stage of the debate.
At one point Mr Darling, the Better Together campaign leader, was left visibly rattled when an audience member launched an angry tirade against him, accusing him of privatising the health service, branding him a hypocrite and shouting: "Don't believe a word coming out of his mouth."
Among 13 questions from the audience put to Mr Salmond and Mr Darling during the 90-minute encounter, Better Together counted 10 from Yes supporters and three from No voters.
A Better Together insider said: "We have made our views known. It looks like the BBC did not have a grip on the make up of the audience or the questions from the floor."
Despite their complaints, No camp strategists privately admitted Mr Salmond came out on top.
However, they insisted his performance, while delighting Yes supporters, would fail to sway undecided voters.
The debate was watched by more than 800,000 viewers in Scotland on BBC1 and by 4.8million people on BBC2 and across a range of platforms across the UK.
The BBC said the audience was balanced between Yes and No voters with a smaller proportion - understood to be 20 per cent of the total - made up of undecided voters.
A spokesman said: "The format - including how the audience would be selected - was set out in advance and agreed by both campaigns."
The spokesman added: "The moderator, Glenn Campbell, made it clear in his introduction to those in Kelvingrove that it was a balanced audience and that all sides had to participate to make it feel as such to the television audience at home."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article