ONE of the world's largest credit ratings agencies has warned it would be difficult for a future independent Scotland to bail out its banks.
Standard and Poor's said rescuing institutions after a Yes vote would be "challenging" .
It also warned that many banks could struggle to cope with the SNP's target of declaring independence by March 2016.
Earlier this year Standard and Poor's assessed an independent Scotland's financial standing saying that it faced "significant, but not unsurpassable" challenges.
The latest assessment is an attempt to look at how to rate Scotland's banks, not the country itself, after independence.
The company pointed to figures originally from a Treasury analysis showing the high ratio between Scotland's GDP and the assets of its banks.
Standard and Poor's analyst Giles Edwards said: "In our view, the willingness and ability of a future Scottish government to support its banking system is challenging at this point, not least because the Scottish banking system's assets are currently a high 1254% of Scottish GDP, which compares with an already high 492% of GDP for the UK, and 880% for Iceland in 2007 just before the (country's) banking system collapsed."
The No campaign described the assessment as "sobering".
A Scottish Government spokes-man said ongoing international reforms were designed to ensure no country should have to bail out its banks again.
The Standard and Poor's briefing note also said it was uncertain whether all Scottish banks would continue to be registered north of the border in the event of a Yes vote.
It warned that major banks, many of which are already embroiled in large-scale restruct-uring processes, could find the SNP's aim to declare independence by early 2016 "challenging".
"A swift negotiation on issues such as monetary policy and regulation would help to reduce uncertainty for banks and allow them time to make the necessary changes," it adds.
But the ratings agency stopped short of saying how it would rate an independent Scotland or its banks. Standard and Poor's also said that it took no position in the independence debate.
A spokesman for Better Together said: "This sobering assessment demonstrates that Scottish savings and Scottish mortgages are more secure as part of the UK.
"We saw in 2008 that the broad shoulders of the United Kingdom were able to save Scottish banks like RBS and prevent the type of situation that we saw happen in other small countries happening here."
A Scottish Government spokesman: "Scotland has all the attributes needed to be an economically successful independent country, which is why another recent Standard & Poor's report concluded that 'even without North Sea output', an independent Scotland would qualify for their 'highest economic assessment', and compared Scotland's economy to that of AAA-listed nations.
"All of the points raised in this latest report have been addressed in the detailed macroeconomic framework put forward by the Fiscal Commission Working Group, and accepted by the Scottish Government. As part of a formal monetary union banks would be assessed against consistent regulatory standards, and there would be harmonised deposit protection."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article