David Cameron is facing a backlash from Tory MPs after throwing his weight behind a last-minute pledge to guarantee more powers for the Scottish Parliament.
A number of senior Conservative backbenchers demanded curbs on the rights of Scots MPs if, as promised, plans to give Holyrood greater control over income tax are fast-tracked through Westminster next year.
Christopher Chope, the MP for the Hampshire seat of Christchurch, said he would attempt to block the transfer of more powers unless wider constitutional changes were agreed.
Another Tory, Bernard Jenkin, chairman of the Public Administration Select Committee and a frequent critic of the PM, said Scots should be barred from becoming Chancellor.
They spoke out after Mr Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg promised "extensive" further devolution if Scots vote No tomorrow.
They said the UK "exists to ensure opportunity and security for all by sharing our resources equitably across all four nations".
They also suggested that the Barnett formula for allocating government funding - which has been criticised by some English MPs as unfairly generous to Scotland - would continue unchanged.
Though the three main UK parties have tabled different proposals for further devolution they have agreed to iron out their differences and produce draft legislation by January under a timetable proposed by Gordon Brown.
Asked on Monday night about the possible consequences for England, Mr Cameron said he was not "remotely" near backing a devolved English parliament.
However, Mr Chope said he would vote against a more-powers package unless there was a wider examination of the balance of powers within the UK as a whole. He told BBC Radio 4's World at One: "I certainly think that people in Scotland should recognise that this is a 'pledge' by party leaders, but that is not a guarantee that that would be implemented in the United Kingdom Parliament."
Fellow Tory John Redwood demanded an "honest" and "more grown-up" constitutional settlement if Scotland stays.
"If Scotland is going to decide some tax rates as well as spending for itself, so should England. What is good enough for Scotland is good enough for England," he said. "It must mean the end of Scottish MPs voting on English schools or English hospitals whilst being unable to do the same for their own.
"There must be no question of Scotland setting her own income rate and then sending MPs to Westminster to help set ours."
Another Conservative MP Rob Wilson said England would not tolerate "another downgrading" if Scotland gained more powers.
Calling for an English executive with its own first minister and finance minister, Mr Jenkin, said: "We could never have a Scottish UK Chancellor setting English taxes in England at the annual budget but not in his or her own constituency.
Danny Alexander, the LibDem Chief Secretary to the Treasury, today seeks to reassure voters that powers over income tax and welfare will be delivered swiftly.
Writing in today's Herald, he says: "If Scotland votes 'no thanks', as I fervently hope will be the case, then Home Rule will swiftly follow."
But a spokesman for Yes Scotland said: "The reality is that the only way to guarantee Scotland gets all the powers we need to create jobs and protect our NHS is with a Yes vote on Thursday - so that we can use our enormous wealth to create a better and fairer country."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article