SCOTTISH billionaire Sir Tom Hunter has criticised George Osborne's plans to cap tax relief on charitable donations as "ill-thought-out and punitive".
The businessman and philanthropist, who has handed out more than £50 million through his charity The Hunter Foundation, was reacting after Downing Street suggested some of Britain's wealthiest people were giving money to bogus charities to avoid tax.
The Ayrshire-born tycoon, who sold his Sports Division chain of shops for £260m in 1998, joined charity leaders who had denounced the UK Government for branding the country's great philanthropists "wealthy tax dodgers".
The Chancellor revealed that he had been shocked by the analysis of the tax returns of some of the UK's richest people, which showed several had paid no tax at all.
Mr Osborne pledged to crack down on aggressive tax avoidance and announced last month in the Budget he would cap tax relief on charitable donations to prevent abuse of the system, affecting organisations such as the Hunter Foundation.
A spokesman for Sir Tom told The Herald: "It's an ill-thought-out and punitive policy which will undoubtedly have a negative impact on giving – including for us – and, in turn, a negative impact on charities.
"We don't agree with it [change in the relief ceiling] at all, and I hope the Chancellor might be persuaded he's misthought this whole agenda. We've got no issue with him picking up on those individuals who misuse the system as a vehicle for tax avoidance but under this policy money which would have been intended for charities will be lost."
He added: "We could all pay no tax and move to Monaco, if that's what he wants."
Mr Osborne's move has also sparked an outcry from Scottish universities and charities, which now fear big donations will dry up as a result.
While a spokesman for David Cameron explained the Treasury was talking to the charity sector about the tax relief cap, he made clear the Government would not budge on the principle.
"The system as it stands is open to abuse and we can't be in a situation where very wealthy individuals are able to wipe out their tax bills by using these reliefs. We don't think it's right someone on a very high income is paying far less tax than the average family," he insisted.
However, the Prime Minister's spokesman then suggested that charities some wealthy people gave to were not really charities at all. He said: "In certain instances, they may be giving to charities and those charities don't, in all cases, do a great deal of charitable work."
The spokesman also suggested some bogus charities were based overseas.
In its analysis, HM Revenue and Customs found the income tax rate among some of the highest earners was, on average, a mere 10% – less than half the rate normally paid by a British taxpayer.
Mr Osborne stressed the HMRC study had convinced him of the need to take action to ensure high earners paid more tax. The returns of the 20 biggest tax avoiders showed they had – legally – been able to reduce their income tax bills by £145m in a year.
From 2013, the total amount of tax relief any individual can claim will be limited to 25% of their income or £50,000, whichever is larger.
John Low, from the Charities Aid Foundation, said: "This is not a ploy to save tax. Philanthropists who make large donations give away far, far more than they could ever claim in tax relief. That money goes to fund projects for the public good such as medical research and help for the most vulnerable in society."
Mr Low added: "We should recognise and celebrate today's great philanthropists, not brand them as wealthy tax dodgers."
The National Galleries of Scotland has already raised concerns about the tax relief cap, saying it could deprive it of the money needed for major projects.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article