JUSTICE Secretary Kenny MacAskill has admitted to MSPs that he has lost the battle with the Treasury to maintain the VAT-free status of the new single police and fire services.
He called the decision "unjustifiable and manifestly unfair". It means the Scottish Police Authority and its sister body, the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service, will lose more than £25 million a year to the Treasury, although the Government claims that even with this the unified services will save £1.7 billion over 15 years.
Last night, the Scottish Police Federation called the decision "nothing short of a scandal and a sign of utter contempt for the Scottish Parliament".
Mr MacAskill told Holyrood's Justice Committee: "I can confirm that, after extensive discussion, HM Treasury has rejected our request that SFRS and the Scottish Police Authority would be able to recover VAT.
"That will mean that the SPA and SFRS will be the only police and fire and rescue authorities in the UK that are unable to recover VAT. Indeed, we understand that following reforms in England and Wales, the new Police Commissioners will be entitled to recover VAT.
"That is manifestly unfair and amounts to a combined annual cost to the Scottish Fire and Police Authorities of around £25m."
The rationale was "in stark contrast to the view taken in relation to Academy Schools in England", for which the Treasury enacted legislation to ensure that they could recover VAT.
Roddy Robertson of the Fire Brigades Union said: "This tax grab will rob the fire service of millions of pounds and could lead to cuts in frontline services."
The Treasury insists that the Scottish Government knew all along that their model for service reform would lead to the loss of VAT exemption and was factored into their costings.
A spokeswoman said: “The UK Government has worked with the Scottish Government to explore whether an element of local funding could be incorporated into the reforms to enable the police and fire service to continue to receive VAT refunds but the Scottish Government has chosen to stick with their original plans.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article