UK DIPLOMATS are working behind the scenes to dampen down concern in Europe that Scotland's independence debate could trigger breakaway movements across the continent.
Confidential communciations reveal the British ambassador in Madrid has been confronted with mounting fears in Spain that the 2014 referendum in Scotland will spark demands for similar polls in Catalonia and the Basque Country.
The documents show UK ministers have been briefed to reassure their Spanish counterparts that Scotland's constitutional question is quite different from those of Spain's minority nations and regions.
Britain's ambassador in Madrid, Giles Paxman, in a telegram marked "restricted", has set out the UK's official response to such speculation.
He said: "We need to step up our efforts to explain why that debate is being played out in different circumstances and why the search for a legal, fair and decisive resolution to Scottish pressure for greater autonomy need not be a threat to Spanish territorial integrity."
Mr Paxman, whose elder brother Jeremy presents Newsnight, stressed the Spanish Government would be unlikely to allow a "regional" plebiscite along the lines of that planned by First Minister Alex Salmond.
The Herald understands Spanish and British ministers have met informally to discuss Scottish independence.
Crucially, however, Mr Paxman signalled that Madrid jitters should not be allowed to interfere with Scotland's referendum. He wrote: "Spanish concerns should not, of course, influence the course of the constitutional debate in the UK."
A London newspaper on Sunday cited an unnamed UK Government minister saying Spain would seek to block the European Union membership of an independent Scotland.
That claim was denied by the Spanish Government but not before it sparked a flurry of newspaper reports in Madrid, Barcelona and elsewhere. The media reaction forced Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Garcia-Margallo to say his country would remain neutral in Scotland's constitutional wrangles.
The UK Government is now apparently sending different signals to audiences at home and abroad. British diplomats overseas are playing down the impact of the referendum on Europe. But UK ministers, addressing a domestic audience, are continuing to play up the antipathy of big European players to Scottish independence.
One Coaltion minister, speaking anonymously to The Herald, insisted Spain was worried, despite its formal denials it would veto Scottish EU membership. He said: "It [Spain] would be extremely unhappy about the thought of member states breaking up and would not make that a straightforward process."
Another senior Coalition source last night stressed the Scottish independence referendum was having "serious political implications" for other European governments.
The source was referring to Spain and Italy – where the regionalist Northern League has shown huge interest in Scotland – and to Romania's Hungarian minority.
Nationalist sources stressed their well-developed international links. Many independence movements – from Corsica to the Caucasus – openly refer to Scotland as their pathfinder.
However, newly independent nations outside the European Union have not always received a warm welcome from the rest of the continent.
Spain, Russia, Greece and Cyprus, for example, have all yet to recognise Kosovo, the breakaway Serbian province. Russia has its own national questions to settle – on either side of its border. Greece and Cyprus fear any precedent for international recognition of the Turkish-speaking Northern Cyprus.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article