ALEX Salmond did not go to the police to complain about his bank account being hacked because he wanted to protect his informant, his spokesman has claimed.
Despite the First Minister revealing for the first time in his evidence to the Leveson Inquiry that his confidential financial records had allegedly been targeted by the Observer in 1999, the spokesman said Mr Salmond's current view was that it was the responsibility of the newspaper and not the police to investigate.
However, he said Mr Salmond "did not rule out the possibility" of referring the matter to the police in the future.
The spokesman confirmed that information that his bank account had been targeted was passed to Mr Salmond by a former Observer journalist in the early 2000s and he would respect the confidentiality of that source.
A former Observer journalist, Alex Bell, is head of policy, research and strategy in Mr Salmond's team of special advisers.
The spokesman said an obligation of reporting the incident to the police would mean having to disclose the informant's identity, and the First Minister believed "that at this point in time that's not necessary".
"What is necessary is that the newspaper looks more deeply into this," he added.
Despite a gap of at least a decade since Mr Salmond was told his banking arrangements had been targeted, the spokesman said he had only complained about it last year because no story had appeared at the time, but it had become relevant again because of the phone-hacking issue and the Leveson Inquiry.
Mr Salmond wrote to the editor of the Observer, John Mulholland, last July, saying: "It has been brought to my attention that there was a strong suggestion that journalists working for the Observer accessed my bank account details in 1999. Could you please let me know if there is any truth or substance in these claims?"
A spokeswoman for the Observer said that on the basis of the information supplied by Mr Salmond they had been unable to find any evidence to substantiate his allegation.
She added: "As our response to him at the time made clear, we take this allegation very seriously, and if he is able to provide us with any more information we will investigate further."
A Labour spokesman said: "If the First Minister has evidence his bank account details were illegally hacked into, we believe it is incumbent upon him to report the matter to the police.
"The First Minister has stated that the source of this information is a former Observer journalist. While we appreciate the First Minister's desire to preserve the anonymity of his source, as one of his most senior aides, Alex Bell, is also a former Observer journalist, it is likely that people will jump to possibly erroneous conclusions.
"In the interests of clarity we believe the First Minister should confirm that Mr Bell is not the source of these allegations."
Mr Salmond's spokesman said: "The First Minister was given the information in confidence, which he will respect, and therefore we will not indulge in a guessing game or a process of elimination on this matter."
Mr Salmond faced more questions about his relationship with the Murdoch empire at First Minister's Questions yesterday when Labour leader Johann Lamont branded him "Rupert Murdoch's lackey" and claimed he failed to ask the tycoon how many jobs a News Corporation takeover of BSkyB would have brought to Scotland.
Mr Salmond has said his interest in the proposed deal was that it would secure jobs.
He insisted the takeover would have been good for employment, citing evidence that Mr Murdoch's son, James, had given to the Leveson Inquiry when he said the deal would potentially lead to an increase in BSkyB's operations in Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article