THE Scottish independence movement is anti-English and the SNP is bent on fostering English nationalism to secure the break-up of the UK, according to a former Conservative Cabinet minister.
John Redwood's remarks last night drew a furious response from First Minister Alex Salmond, who described them as "spectacularly ill-informed and ill-judged".
Mr Redwood insisted English nationalism was now the "new force in UK politics".
He argued that, if the First Minister failed in his bid for independence but instead secured devo-max for Scotland, England should have its own devo-max.
Writing in his blog, he
argued the SNP "enjoys using the EU against England".
He said: "It all helps to antagonise the England they wish to leave in a way, which might help the change they want."
Mr Redwood said one of the ironies of the independence movement was it was a "dependence movement, wishing to shift Scotland to Brussels control directly". He added: "It is an anti-English movement more than it is an independence movement."
The backbencher said he was happy independence was a matter for Scots but only on the understanding that, should they decide to stay in the Union, there must be a new deal for England.
"If Scotland seeks devo-max, and the Government is prepared to offer it ... we must insist on devo-max for England," he said.
He called for a new relationship with the EU, saying it "fits ill with English nationalism ... the new force in UK politics, which the SNP is fostering".
A spokesman for Mr Salmond said: "These are spectacularly ill-informed and ill-judged comments, which are plain wrong."
He said Scots independence would be good for Scotland and England, creating a new relationship of equality and friendship.
He added: "That is the positive message the First Minister has taken to people in England in a series of speeches, which have received an extremely enthusiastic response."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article