POLICE are investigating allegations that officers allowed an extreme right wing racist group to protest illegally in Glasgow city centre after it hijacked an organised demonstration backing asylum seekers.
Green MSP Patrick Harvie raised the issue with Alex Salmond, branding the Scottish Defence League (SDL) "obnoxious and disgusting".
Mr Harvie said the allegations centred on a council-approved protest by the Campaign to Welcome Refugees in George Square.
He said the SDL disrupted the event, leading to police telling organisers it had to end early for public order reasons.
Mr Harvie said the SDL was then permitted by police to hold a short demonstration in the square despite having no prior official permission and then marched down Buchanan Street before leaving the city centre.
He said: "These are people who are clearly breaching the peace and should have been taken off the streets.
"If there is a threat to public order it should be the people who pose that threat who should be removed from the streets."
The Glasgow MSP said he feared the SDL would increasingly use this tactic of targeting legitimate events in the city.
Mr Salmond said he had every confidence in Strathclyde Police to investigate the matter.
He said: "Patrick Harvie and I are at one in his description of the Scottish Defence League. The chief constable of Strathclyde, in whom I have great confidence, is pursuing the investigations. The results will no doubt inform lessons for the future."
A previous SDL march through the city earlier this year was called off after discussions with police and council officials following calls for it to be banned by Glasgow politicians
A static protest took place instead in St Enoch Square, with a heavy police presence around the square and in the city centre as SDL members were bussed in and out of the city
A spokeswoman for Strathclyde Police said: "We can confirm officers from Strathclyde Police met with representatives from All Scotland's Refugees Welcome Here organisation on Friday, June 22. Further investigations in to the policing operation is under way. It would be inappropriate to comment further."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article