DAVID Cameron's determination to push ahead with legalising gay marriage could cost him votes at the next General Election, the latest poll suggests.
The ComRes online snapshot of 2000 adults on the eve of today's vote on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill showed 34% of people felt it made the Tories less appealing while only 15% said it made them more appealing.
However, the British public appears evenly split as to whether or not the Coalition is right to legislate for same-sex marriage with 42% saying it is and 40% saying it is not.
After 20 present and past Conservative local party chairmen warned the Prime Minister at the weekend that the proposed change could harm Tory electoral prospects, more pressure was heaped on him when Justin Welby, as he was confirmed as the new Archbishop of Canterbury, said he stood by the previous criticism of the Coalition's legislative plans for gay marriage by bishops from the Church of England – often regarded as the Tory party at prayer.
In contrast, 50 senior Conservative activists yesterday warned the party risked alienating voters if it did not back same-sex marriage.
Today, a combination of Tory, Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs look set to give the bill its second reading.
Labour leader Ed Miliband said he would "proudly" vote in favour and would urge his MPs to join him in making "an important step forward in the fight for equality".
Yet the focus will be on the Conservative rebellion with reports suggesting as many as 120 Tories, including ministers, could rebel against the official Coalition line.
UK Government ministers yesterday took to the media to back the legislation.
Maria Miller, the Culture Secretary, made clear Conservative anger would not prevent the Coalition from pushing ahead with legislation. She said the proposed change was in line with the party's progressive past on issues such as slavery.
David Mundell, the Scotland Office Minister and the only Scottish Conservative MP, told The Herald he would support the bill.
"It's a matter of equality. I can't see there is any reason that would justify not supporting it," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article