MSPs have backed plans for a law change to reduce the drink-drive limit, as a new survey found seven out of ten Scots supported the move.
Calls to cut the limit from 80mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood to 50mg were backed overwhelmingly in a Holyrood vote.
It followed an Ipsos MORI poll showing seven out of 10 Scots agreed, with 55% "strongly" supporting the plan. Just over one-quarter (26%) opposed a cut in the limit.
Support for a reduction was strongest among those aged 55 or over, with 73% of the age group backing a lower limit. Three-quarters of people living in rural parts of Scotland also favoured tougher laws.
The poll of more than 1000 people came as MSPs debated calls to reduce the drink-drive limit for the first time since powers were transferred from Westminster.
The Scottish Government has launched a consultation on the issue and is expected to legislate in the coming months.
Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill told MSPs that one in 30 drivers involved in accidents last year were over the limit or refused to take a breath test.
Drink-driving led to 750 casualties in 2010, he said, though the figure has fallen from 1150 in 2000.
He added: "While we welcome a reduction in the number of casualties, I still find these figures unacceptably high.
"The people of Scotland are fed up with drink-drivers and their poor excuses. It is both remarkable and tragic that a significant minority of drivers still ignore the warnings.
"We believe the current limit has had its day.
"The time is right for a change that will bring Scotland in line with the vast majority of Europe. If you look at the drink-driving limits across Europe, it is only the UK and Malta that have a legal blood alcohol concentration limit of 80mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood."
Holyrood was handed control over drink-drive limits under the Scotland Act passed earlier this year.
Mr MacAskill has also called for additional powers to be devolved, allowing Scots police officers to conduct random breath tests on motorists, not just those whose driving caused suspicion.
Labour justice spokesman Lewis Macdonald said there was strong evidence to support calls for random testing and would not "in principle" oppose extra powers for Holyrood.
Tory Alex Johnstone said drink-driving was a "scourge on this country" but claimed cutting the limit would distract police from targeting the most serious offenders.
Scottish Liberal Democrat justice spokeswoman Alison McInnes MSP said: "It is concerning that the Conservatives have argued lowering the drink- driving limit could criminalise less serious behaviour.
"We must be clear there is no situation where being a little over the limit is acceptable. Reducing the drink-drive limit is a further step towards safer roads in Scotland.
"But setting the drink-driving limit is not a cure-all. The Scottish Government must go out of its way to educate drivers about the dangers of drink-driving."
MSPs backed the Government's consultation by 100 to 12, with the Tories opposing the move.
Mark Diffley, Ipsos MORI research director, said: "The Scottish Government has signalled its intention to lower the drink-drive limit and the public is broadly supportive of such moves.
"Although younger people are more likely to oppose the measure, it is clear that any reduction will enjoy the support of all groups and will be a largely popular policy."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article