THE Scotland Bill's transfer of powers from Westminster to Holyrood was backed unanimously by MSPs last night despite SNP reservations about the "missed opportunity" of the proposals.
Cabinet Secretary Alex Neil brushed aside Opposition jibes about the SNP's failure to secure concessions on the bill as he summed up in the debate on the move in Scottish Parliament, say-ing: "We may not have got it this time, but in two years time we'll be in control of the whole lot."
The increase in the Holyrood tax take from 7% to 16% represented by the changes were "modest by any degree" and would not excite voters, he said.The SNP demanded a series of concessions it failed to secure, but pointed out most of these were also Liberal Democrat policy.
Full borrowing powers, control of the Crown Estate, guaranteed European representation, Corporation tax, Excise Duty and control over broadcasting were all demands originally made by the Scottish Government.
In return Westminster has offered to look in future at further reviewing borrowing powers and the issuing of bonds and to review the relationship between Scotland's courts and the UK Supreme Court.
Under the proposals Scottish ministers will be able to raise up to £2.2 billion in capital borrowing, limited to 10% of the Scottish budget each year. For revenue, Scottish ministers will be able to borrow £200 million a year from the UK Government, capped at a cumulative total of £500m.
The bill will include powers over air guns, responsibility for drink-driving and the national speed limit on Scottish roads, a small role in appointments to Gaelic broadcaster MG Alba and the Crown Estate, and a new procedure for Scottish criminal cases that go to the UK Supreme Court.
Of more importance was an agreement that the final detail on the calculation to cut Scotland's block grant, to compensate for the transfer of income tax powers, will be subject to approval by MSPs. That calculation will also be based on the funding formula arrived at by the Holtham inquiry into the funding of the Welsh Parliament, another factor deemed crucial by Scots ministers.
Last night David Cameron, who is in Scotland today, said it was an example of the four main parties working together. He said: "This is a major milestone in the constitution of Scotland, with more responsibility and accountability handed to Scots."
Scottish Government Strategy Minister Bruce Crawford said these "important changes" meant the bill "will not harm Scotland's interests and will provide some increase in responsibilities for this Parliament".
He said ministers are now "satisfied the bill no longer poses a threat to devolved interests" but said it "could have been so much better".
Labour chief whip James Kelly said SNP demands had "melted away to a damp squib", while Conservative MSP David McLetchie said the Scottish Government position is "either a humiliating climbdown or a tactical retreat". He added: "Perhaps it is a mixture of both but when one looks back on the heady days of last summer and reflects on the rhetoric of the First Minister and his so-called six demands, there is no doubt people unaccustomed to humility should now be eating a large slice of humble pie."
LibDem leader Willie Rennie said the SNP had "failed to make its case" for its six demands as the bill passed through Westminster calling the demands "a catalogue of errors and blunders".
Mr Crawford attacked the "joy-ful" opposition to these powers, adding: "Every party in this chamber has publicly said Scotland should be granted more powers than are currently in this bill. However, we live in strange times, when our opponents would rather deny their own policies than be seen to be agreeing with this Government."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article