FORMER Deputy First Minister and Liberal Democrat peer Lord Stephen has effectively slapped down party colleagues Michael Moore and Nick Clegg by saying Westminster politicians should keep out of the referendum debate.
He was critical of Downing Street spin doctors for presenting the 18-month deadline on a legally-binding referendum as a threat, saying the plan was logical but it should not come from Westminster.
"It's best that the campaign is run from Scotland and that Scottish politicians in Edinburgh and the Scottish Parliament take the lead role in the campaign," he said.
"People like David Cameron, and indeed Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband, becoming too central in the campaign will just provide ammunition to Alex Salmond -
"Any opportunity that Alex Salmond gets to turn this into a party-political confrontation between Scotland and Westminster he will try to grab with both hands."
Lord Stephen thought offering power in the Scotland Bill to Holyrood to organise a referendum was right but added: "I think the way it was announced by the UK Prime Minister and the spin talking about 'this has to happen in 18 months' plays into Alex Salmond's hands."
The SNP pointed out another LibDem former deputy first minister had said "a politically sensible" UK Government would not set a referendum."
SNP MSP Linda Fabiani, who convened the Scotland Bill Committee, said: "Labour and the LibDems must be squirming as they watch their leaders sign up with an unpopular Tory party to campaign against the ambitions of the people of Scotland - Lord Stephen and Tavish Scott recognise the need for the campaign and the referendum to be made in Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article