Labour has launched a campaign against the Government's plan to privatise the Royal Mail, branding the move "dangerous".
The party leadership is throwing its weight behind growing opposition to the sell-off.
Royal Mail managers this week voted strongly against privatisation, while the Communication Workers Union is threatening to ballot its members for a strike unless there is a deal on pay, pensions, jobs and other issues linked to the sell-off.
Labour MPs will stress the public and businesses rely on a daily delivery service and will warn that places where it is expensive or complicated to deliver the post every day - such as rural areas or blocks of flats - could be "vulnerable" if privatisation goes ahead.
The party is also warning many customers might have to travel miles to pick up large parcels. It says a privatised Royal Mail could choose to sell off its assets, such as local delivery offices.
A Labour source said: "In rural areas the local post office acts as a focal point for communities. There are also the small businesses that use the Royal Mail for ensuring customers get their goods and services on time and at a reasonable price.
"Which is why the Government's plans for privatising Royal Mail are so dangerous."
A Department For Business spokesman said: "This cynical scaremongering will not succeed in stopping our plans to ensure Royal Mail can thrive and deliver a better service to consumers and business.
"Regardless of ownership, Royal Mail will still be the UK's designated universal service provider and will continue to provide deliveries to all UK addresses - rural and urban - six days a week, only Parliament can change this.
"The Post Office is not for sale and there will be no programme of closures under this Government."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article