LABOUR MPs have been criticised by a senior Scottish party figure for their failure to vote against the cut in the top rate of tax after the Budget.
The party's Holyrood finance spokesman and former leadership challenger Ken Macintosh said they could have learned "a little bit more political savvy, a bit of better news management and a bit of political spin" .
Mr Macintosh's comments follow the publication of leaked emails that showed Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls' political adviser Alex Belardinelli admitting to a "screw-up" that led to Labour failing to back an SNP/Plaid Cymru vote in the Commons against the UK Government's cut in the top rate of tax from 50p to 45p.
An adviser to Shadow Scottish Secretary Margaret Curran told Labour's Scottish press office to "hold off releasing in Scotland just yet, in the hope that it is ignored".
Mr Macintosh said: " I suspect there are those on the Tory side that think with a little bit more political savvy, a bit of better news management and a bit of political spin, this could all have been handled better, which is something perhaps our own side could have learned."
Finance Secretary John Swinney hailed "the absolutely marvellous email trail of transparency that the Labour party presides over". He said: "It's the first time that Labour has been shy putting out press lines to the media. It's better than any freedom of information request I've had to authorise, I can tell you, and it didn't even cost us any money."
Mr Swinney criticised the top-rate tax cut, the rise in income tax for pensioners, increases in VAT, national insurance and fuel duty, as well as cuts to tax credits, child benefit and housing benefit. However, he said he was "a fair man" and welcomed tax relief on decommissioning oil platforms, more generous oil field allowances, enhanced capital for three Scottish enterprise areas and tax breaks for the computer games industry.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article