CHANCELLOR George Osborne is under increasing pressure from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to ease his austerity programme.
David Lipton, the IMF's first deputy managing director, said the "pace of consolidation" should be reconsidered given the weakness of the UK economy.
It is a fresh blow for Osborne, who yesterday saw a second ratings agency strip the UK of its prized AAA status.
Fitch placed the UK on an AA+ rating, following Moody's downgrade of UK debt in February, saying the move reflected a "weaker economic and fiscal outlook".
Earlier this week the IMF cut the UK's growth forecast growth from 1% to 0.7% this year and 2014's projection from 1.9% to 1.5%, noting the recovery was "progressing slowly".
Lipton said: "The Fund's view is clear: the UK economy has turned out to be somewhat weaker than had been foreseen, so our view is the pace of consolidation ought to be reconsidered, and we'll want to come and have some discussions over that."
Lipton stressed it was still "very important" that the UK Government maintained fiscal consolidation as a goal. But he added: "The question now is whether the pace is right or too ambitious given the weakness of the economy.
"The key to us, the bottom line to us, is that they may want to consider adjusting the pace of consolidation."
He said the subject would be discussed with the UK during the "Article IV consultation" – the annual health check on the economy.
Lipton's comments come as Mr Osborne criticised the SNP for "tying themselves in knots" over plans to retain the pound in the event of a Yes vote next year.
In a UK Government article, co-written with Treasury Chief Secretary Danny Alexander, they said a currency union could only work as part of a political and economic union.
The article comes ahead of the publication on Tuesday of the UK Government's analysis of the implications for the currency of an independent Scotland.
The Scottish Government has set out plans to retain the pound as Scotland's currency if the country votes for independence in next year's referendum, in what the First Minister has described as a "sterling zone" with the rest of the UK.
Economics experts in the Fiscal Commission Working Group, set up by Alex Salmond, have already concluded that keeping sterling as the currency in an independent Scotland was "sensible" and an attractive choice for the rest of the UK.
In the article, Osborne and Alexander wrote: "This isn't a question of whether or not Scotland could go it alone – of course Scotland could.
"The real question is whether going it alone is the best way for people living in Scotland to realise their aspirations and provide security for themselves and their family.
"For the advocates of independence the United Kingdom doesn't work. For them all the risk and uncertainty of separation is worth it just to have control of all the decisions of a fully sovereign state. But they're tying themselves in knots.
"They know in their heart of hearts that the economic and political union we have across the UK does work. And that a formal currency union can only work with political and economic union.
However, Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said maintaining the pound in an independent Scotland was the "common sense position supported by the facts".
"A sterling zone is in the economic interests of the rest of the UK every bit as much as it is in the interests of Scotland," she said.
"An independent Scotland using the pound will mean Sterling's balance of payments will be massively boosted by Scotland's huge assets, including North Sea oil and gas – which alone swelled the UK's balance of payments by £40 billion in 2011-12."
Meanwhile, a Westminister committee has warned Osborne his plan to boost home ownership risks skewing the housing market and leaving the Treasury with a hole in its coffers. MPs on the Treasury select committee fear the Chancellor's decision to introduce mortgage guarantees under the Help To Buy scheme makes the Government a player in the market with an interest in maintaining house prices.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article