CHURCHES across Britain stepped up their campaign against gay marriage last night with Scotland for Marriage insisting the proposed exemption for priests and ministers, enabling them to refuse to solemnise same-sex ceremonies, was "completely worthless" because it would be successfully challenged in court on equality grounds.
The campaign, supported by among others the Catholic Bishops' Conference of Scotland and The Christian Institute, said legal opinion it had commissioned from leading QC Aidan O'Neill showed that equalising marriage would have a "draconian impact" on Scotland.
This would include:
l Priests and ministers being sued for refusing to allow gay marriages in their churches;
l workers facing the sack for opposing same-sex unions;
l schoolchildren being "forced to attend gay history lessons"; and
l couples being rejected as foster parents if they opposed the new equality legislation.
A campaign spokesman said: "This judgment lays bare Scottish Government promises of exemptions and protections for churches as completely worthless.
"This detailed legal analysis shows same-sex marriage is not about allowing same-sex couples to walk up the aisle as politicians and campaigners have wrongly claimed, it is about redefining society."
The campaign said Holyrood's proposed exemption allowing priests and ministers to refuse to hold a gay marriage would be worthless because the new law would become a "stepping stone for the gay rights lobby, using European human rights legislation, to eventually force the Government to capitulate and remove the clauses preventing the performance of the same-sex marriages by certain institutions or individuals".
The UK Government, which is also proposing an exemption for churches and other religious institutions, continued to insist yesterday that, according to its legal advice, "no Church of England minister should face a legal challenge" if they refused to solemnise a gay marriage.
However, Justice Minister Crispin Blunt conceded the aim of exempting religious groups from offering gay marriage might be "problematic legally".
Already, Cardinal Keith O'Brien, head of Catholics in Scotland, has lambasted the UK and Scottish governments for considering introducing gay civil marriage, saying it was a "grotesque subversion of a universally accepted human right".
Yesterday, the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales joined the Church of England in attacking the proposed equalisation of marriage.
Catholic bishops south of the Border described marriage as a "unique institution" whose distinguishing characteristics centred on the "biological complementarity" of men and women and the possibility of children.
A 500,000-strong petition opposing same-sex marriage was handed into Downing Street by the Coalition for Marriage.
Earlier, the Church of England warned legalising gay marriage could lead to it being forced out of its traditional role in wedding services and cause the biggest rupture with the state for 500 years. It even hinted the move could unravel its role as the established church.
Gay rights campaigners accused it of overreacting and of performing a "master-class in melodramatic scaremongering".
The controversial subject is set to become a political headache for Alex Salmond before it becomes one for David Cameron.
The Scottish Government's consultation, which received more than 50,000 responses, ended in December and the results are due to be published within a fortnight.
The UK Government's – which is thought to have attracted the biggest reaction ever to a public consultation with more than 100,000 responses – ends today with the results due before the end of the year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article