THE CAMPAIGN to retain the names and badges of Scotland's historic regiments received a major boost from the Prime Minister last night.
It has emerged David Cameron has let it be known within Whitehall that he is not personally convinced scrapping any of them would be a good idea either militarily or politically.
The row over the possible threat to traditional names like the Black Watch continued yesterday when Philip Hammond, the UK Defence Secretary, insisted replacing names with numbers was not an option.
However, he failed to say whether all historic regimental names in Scotland would be retained.
In the Commons, Labour's Jim Murphy insisted Scottish military tradition could not be cast aside.
He asked the Secretary of State to reassure people the traditional names, identities and cap badges would be retained.
"Failure to do so," he declared, "will show yet again that this is a Government totally out of touch with Scotland."
Mr Hammond insisted he had no intention of introducing a "continental-style army", with numbers replacing names.
Angus Robertson for the SNP asked whether the Secretary of State could "rule out the prospect of any further amalgamation or disbandment of Scottish-raised units".
Mr Hammond insisted the defence of Scotland did not just happen in the country itself but under the oceans and in places like Afghanistan and then added: "I will tell him frankly: we are going to have a smaller army.
"You can't have a smaller army without some structural changes."
This lack of reassurance later led Mr Murphy to say: "The Secretary of State's response was totally inadequate.
"He seems to be in denial about the strength of feeling in Scotland."
Mr Robertson, the Nationalists' defence spokesman at Westminster, added: "Philip Hammond's refusal to rule out further amalgamation or disbandment of Scottish-raised units is a further betrayal of promises by the Tories when they were in opposition that they would reinstate Scottish army units."
The SNP has pledged to reinstate any historic name that is lost.
However, Coalition sources indicated the prospect of any historic Scottish regimental name being scrapped had diminished markedly because of the Prime Minister's intervention.
Last week, it was suggested Mr Cameron had taken a "personal interest" in the issue after a warning from Ruth Davidson, the Scottish Conservative leader, that losing any traditional name could have a disastrous effect on the pro-UK referendum campaign.
Last night, one Coalition source told The Herald: "The PM is not convinced by the idea that the names of the historic regiments should be scrapped in Scotland."
As Mr Hammond mulls over the options, it was suggested Michael Moore, the Scottish Secretary, had become "seriously engaged" in trying to retain the Scottish regimental names.
One option being talked about is that if one or two regular Scots battalions were cut, their historic names and badges could be given to Scotland's two TA battalions.
Another senior Coalition source said: "People are conscious that the golden thread of tradition still matters.
"The Prime Minister is taking an interest in this but no final decision has been made yet."
He added: "We are determined to get this right and not rush to answer the scaremongers."
A decision on how the Army numbers will be cut is due before Westminster's July recess.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article