David Cameron's pledge to make energy companies give every customer their cheapest rates was in disarray last night when his tough stance appeared to unravel in less than 24 hours.
The Prime Minister was criticised by consumer groups, who said his energy policy was more convoluted than pricing schemes used by gas companies.
Observers dubbed the fallout the "combishambles", a reference to this year's Budget "omnishambles" which led to weeks of confusion followed by a series of humiliating Government U-turns.
Mr Cameron attempted to clarify the situation but stopped short of repeating his previous guarantee that he would compel energy firms, saying only his Government would use its forthcoming Energy Bill to "ensure that customers get the lowest tariffs".
Earlier Energy Secretary Ed Davey had suggested the legislation would not force companies to charge customers their best deal, only oblige them to offer their cheapest tariffs.
Downing Street also appeared to row back on the pledge by suggesting not every consumer would benefit from the move, saying it wanted to make sure "more people" received cheaper deals.
The Coalition seemed to blame customers for high bills, saying too many people did not take advantage of the option to shop around for better deals.
The confusion comes at the worst possible time for consumers, who this week were hit with another round of price hikes by energy companies.
Wednesday's announcement by the Conservative leader, during Prime Minister's Questions, appeared to surprise many, including electricity firms and even those in Whitehall.
As Labour accused the Government of plunging its energy policy into confusion, and likened the situation to the BBC satire The Thick of It, Energy Minister John Hayes refused to answer accusations that he first heard of the pledge when it was made. Asked whether he had known about the announcement in advance, he told MPs: "Does [Mr Cameron] give me notice of every answer? Does he get notice of every question? Of course the answer is no."
Labour said the Coalition had made up energy policy on the hoof and then desperately attempted to make it work. The party accused ministers of "pretending to have a policy they have no intention of implementing".
Charities and consumer groups were equally scathing. Greenpeace executive director John Sauven said: "The Government's energy policy is now as confusing as British Gas tariffs."
Which? executive director Richard Lloyd warned: "Just giving people information on the lowest tariff is not enough when trust is at an all-time low in the industry and switching levels are falling."
Meanwhile, the Federation of Small Businesses said the plan could actually lead to many customers seeing their bills increase by eroding competition in the market. Other business leaders warned the confusion could jeopardise billions of pounds of investment.
Neil Bentley, deputy director general of the CBI, said: "What this actually does is create a lot more uncertainty for companies who are looking to invest in the UK and invest in our energy infrastructure and new power stations. That's not good because we need companies to be looking to the UK to invest billions of pounds which are going to help create jobs in construction and engineering."
Arriving in Brussels for an EU summit last night, Mr Cameron said he was on the side of hard-pressed families "who struggle to pay energy bills".
"That's what I said in the House of Commons yesterday. We are going to use the Energy Bill, coming up this year, so we make sure that customers get the lowest tariffs," he added.
Earlier this year Liberal Democrat Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg outlined plans to oblige companies to inform customers of their cheapest rates. Asked what the difference was between that announcement and the Prime Minister's, No 10 said: "The difference is we are going to legislate so people get the lowest tariffs."
Earlier this year the Coalition announced a series of U-turns on controversial tax plans.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article