ENGINEERING leaders have added to growing calls from business for a speedy referendum on independence, amid warnings that uncertainty could undermine company development.
Peter Hughes, chief executive of Scottish Engineering, said the "vast majority" of his members wanted the vote to be held before autumn 2014, the SNP's preferred timescale. It followed a survey of members of the group, which indicated only 22% were happy with the 2014 date, while almost three-quarters (74%) wanted the referendum to be held "much earlier".
Mr Hughes said uncertainty over the issue could undermine company development both in Scotland and abroad and he called on politicians to answer key questions on independence as he accused them of indulging in "political rhetoric".
His intervention, in the latest issue of the group's quarterly review which is published today, follows similar calls from industry leaders, including SSE and the Weir Group, in recent days. Yesterday the chief executive of the Miller Group, the Edinburgh construction and property firm, also called for the vote to be held "sooner rather than later".
Mr Hughes's comments were welcomed by Scottish Secretary Michael Moore, who said business was making its voice heard "loud and clear". He said an "undeniable head of steam" was building up, adding: "Let's get on with asking the Scottish people a single question next year."
But the Scottish Government hit back last night, claiming other industry leaders had said that holding the vote in 2014 would make no difference to business.
Finance Secretary John Swinney also insisted his administration was "absolutely committed" to having a full debate on Scotland's future.
The row comes as Labour leader Ed Miliband is today expected to tell the Scottish Labour conference in Dundee that Scotland and England would be weaker apart, saying: "If we are going to build an economy that works for working people, we are going to have to build it together."
Earlier this week it was claimed the referendum would be held on October 18, 2014, although this was later played down as only a possibility. It is understood the Scottish Government's preferred timescale is a three-week window around that date.
The Scottish Engineering survey analysed about 100 responses from the group's 400 members and Mr Hughes said results indicated most were keen to see a "speedy resolution" to the referendum issue.
He added: "As we all know, uncertainty can seriously undermine the confidence of companies growing and developing their business both at home and abroad.
"As yet we have not seriously entered the well-informed debate phase on the question of independence. It is important our politicians start to answer the key questions which we have been asking, rather than indulge in political rhetoric."
Mr Swinney said the executive director of the Institute of Directors (IoD) Scotland, David Watt, had said holding the referendum in 2014 would make no difference to business and none of the IoD's 1600 Scottish members had raised any concerns about the timetable.
Mr Swinney said: "We are absolutely committed to having a fully informed debate on Scotland's future, which is why in the coming months we will continue to set out what independence means for people and business in Scotland."
He added that the Government would publish the full prospectus for independence in autumn next year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article