MPs gathered to mark Baroness Thatcher's passing with more than seven hours of tributes in the House of Commons that at times descended into little more than a slanging match.
The rancour was all the more surprising as many of her staunchest critics had stayed away, warning the event would be a state-sponsored eulogy.
But there were angry scenes as former Hollywood star and Labour MP Glenda Jackson delivered a passionate speech saying Thatcherism had wrought the "most heinous, social, spiritual and economic damage upon this country".
David Cameron missed her comments, as he had left the chamber while another Labour MP railed against mass unemployment. The Prime Minister had opened the debate by paying tribute to his predecessor as an "extraordinary leader and extraordinary woman".
Mr Cameron told MPs: "Let this be her epitaph – she made our country great again."
He praised her achievement in becoming both leader of the Conservative Party and prime minister at a time when it was "almost inconceivable" a woman could hold these roles.
However, the Conservative leader had heard the SNP's Angus Roberston, who described Baroness Thatcher as "one of the most formidable politicians of recent times" but warned: "We will never forget, we will never forgive the poll tax being imposed on Scots a year before the rest of the UK."
Ed Miliband told MPs he recognised the former Conservative leader's achievements even as he criticised her attitude to gay rights, the miners strike and Nelson Mandela.
But as the hours wore on the tone began to change.
David Anderson, the Labour MP for Blaydon, said "Mrs Thatcher's lack of empathy, her intransigence, her failure to see the other side, her refusal to even look at the other side has left [many communities] bitter and resentful."
In response the Tories appealed to the Speaker that the event was not designed as an opportunity to "denigrate" a former prime minister. Proof, if needed, of her enduring ability to divide.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article