A LEADING atheist who led Time for Reflection at the Scottish Parliament has outraged the Catholic Church with his comments on the contribution he believes faith schooling makes to bigotry.
Professor AC Grayling criticised the whole concept of faith schools during a brief visit to the Scottish Parliament yesterday.
Speaking at a meeting in Holyrood for a group of secularists and humanists, the academic said of religious-based education: "The argument against faith-based schools can be summed up in two words – Northern Ireland. Or perhaps one word – Glasgow."
A spokesman for the Catholic Church in Scotland said: "It is unfortunate that Professor Grayling chose to make ill-informed comments about Scottish schools.
"The Universal Declaration of Human Rights gives parents the right to have their children educated in accordance with their beliefs."
He said a "mature" education system would allow multiple faiths rather than a one-size-fits-all model.
However, at Mr Grayling's meeting at Holyrood with secular and humanist representatives there was a confidence that, in time, parents would succeed in removing religious education from schools.
He also claimed religions jumped to the head of the queue when it came to debate on public issues across the UK.
Churches which collectively took in 3% of the population on any regular basis found themselves "at the front of the queue of lobbyists", said Mr Grayling.
He said that once churches became minority groups they should "join the queue like anyone else".
The academic, whose full name is Anthony Clifford Grayling, was critical of educational changes south of the Border which were opening the way to interventions from extreme religious groups advocating Creationism.
He also argued that the Catholic Church as a major multinational organisation had to take more responsibility for child abuse in its ranks, saying the Pope should be responsible as "chief executive officer".
Mr Grayling also presented Time For Reflection at the Scottish Parliament yesterday, becoming one of the most senior figures in the UK atheist and humanist community to deliver the slot.
There, Mr Grayling's appearance was greeted among MSPs by similar numbers that often attend what would yesterday become, for the day, the Non God Slot.
Mr Grayling's contribution in the Chamber clearly sought to be inoffensive.
He spoke of his mother – named Burns and born on January 25 – to make a connection to Scotland, and then spoke about his great hero David Hume and "his prescient view of morality and of human nature."
He said Mr Hume's argument was that humans were social beings, who were capable of millions of acts of human kindness, of organisation and conflict.
He argued: "We were also capable of division – the latter caused by tribalism."
It was a brief and understated secular sermon designed to advance the cause of humanism rather than pick a fight with organised religion.
But his full feelings on "tribalism" had come out earlier at his meeting in the Parliament for staffers and invited figures.
Mr Grayling recently published The God Argument, which sums up the difference between his approach and that of Britain's most fiercely public atheist, Richard Dawkins, who called his most famous book The God Delusion. He has frequently visited Scotland, in particular the Edinburgh Book Festival, and has built up a friendship with a cleric, Bishop Richard Holloway.
Mr Grayling was born in Zambia and lectured at Oxford before becoming professor of philosophy at London University.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article