IT'S been an unusual Labour conference.
Where in the past there were raging rows over policies, personality clashes and certain key figures sowing the seeds of division, there have been few policies to get steamed up about, there are fewer and fewer personalities to clash and a kind of warm placidity has embraced the delegates, who have put on a united front.
In fact, this conference has really been about one thing and one thing only – Ed Miliband. Perhaps it was the strategy all along to have a policy-lite conference, to enable the media's unblinking eye to focus entirely on Ed the comprehensive schoolboy, Ed the doting dad, Ed the Harvard professor, Ed the nice guy and Ed the leader with compassion but also steel.
Project Ed was aimed at trying to convince voters the geek could transform himself into a potential prime minister. So there was a lot resting on his keynote speech. And, certainly for the conference audience, he delivered.
Margaret Curran, the feisty Shadow Scottish Secretary, could not contain her enthusiasm as she skipped down spin alley, singing Ed's praises and how he had delivered a fantastic speech. He had, she insisted, displayed a "Thatcheresque" inner confidence; an adjective she meant as a big compliment but which others might raise an eyebrow at.
Even the cynical press corps had to admit the boy done good, and union barons who had berated the Labour leader for not backing them on the public sector pay freeze were overcome with admiration, saying his speech was a "tour de force".
Labour HQ, having had to endure a less than expansive coverage in the newspapers for the first two days of conference, suddenly was delighted that their leader was getting rave reviews.
Yet, it is one thing to convince your party – which of course is very important – but it's another to convince the public.
And what looks and feels good amid the heady atmosphere of a friendly conference hall, might not look or feel good from the cool indifference of a living- room sofa.
This weekend's opinion polls will be interesting reading to see if "Super Ed" has convinced the voters that he has what it takes to stand on the steps of Downing Street the day after polling day.
It was also an unusual Labour conference in that not only did a Tory peer, Lord Coe, receive a standing ovation from the comrades – for his role in the Olympic triumph – but not one, but two, former Conservative prime ministers were invoked to emphasise the party's new core message and rebranding as One Nation Labour.
Sir Robert Peel had got it right, insisted Yvette Cooper, the Shadow Home Secretary, when he promoted community policing with his phrase "the police is the public, the public is the police".
However, it was Mr Miliband's audacious appropriation of the One Nation politics advocated 150 years ago by Benjamin Disraeli, which must have got Tory lieutenants choking on their foie gras. The One Nation theme – which might sit oddly as there are three nations in Britain – will from here on in run through every policy.
While Mr Miliband outlined his plan to split the banks, raise the top rate of income tax back to 50p, reform company takeover rules, hand more power to shareholders, tone down his attack on City predators; and talked more about vocational training and apprenticeships, there was little in the way of policy ideas throughout the conference.
Indeed, the Labour leader has asked his colleagues to go away and draw up One Nation policies. While aides stress he believes in universal benefits, Mr Miliband will look at individual ones as part of his proposed zero-sum review, part of which could take place before the next General Election.
However, it seems clear the issue of benefits such as the winter fuel allowance and free television licences going to the better-off while services are starved elsewhere will be a theme that is likely to be at the top of the agenda for both the 2015 and 2016 elections.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article