NICOLA Sturgeon has called for new national debate on immigration, warning of long-term harm to public services and the economy if Brexit cuts the flow of EU migrants to Scotland.
The First Minister said she wanted to “change the narrative” on migration, and persuade people it was vital to the national interest given Scotland’s worrying demographic trends.
She admitted it was not an easy subject for politicians, and people's concerns "cannot simply be dismissed".
READ MORE: Davidson dismisses Sturgeon Brexit paper as a sham
But she said that without inward migration Scotland’s recent population growth would go into reverse, creating a double-whammy of fewer working age taxpayers and an increasing elderly population to support.
Ms Sturgeon faces an uphill struggle to sell her message.
The National Centre for Social Research last week reported a majority of Scots want to leave the European single market and restrict immigration for EU citizens after Brexit.
Two-thirds also want Scotland and the UK to have the same immigration regime after Brexit.
Ms Sturgeon’s call came as she published a new Scottish Government analysis warning a hard Brexit could cut Scottish GDP by £12.7bn, or 8.5 per cent, by 2030.
Even a soft Brexit, in which the UK stayed in the single market and accepted freedom of movement and other EU conditions, would cut Scottish GDP by 2.7 per cent, it said.
It offered no upside to Brexit, other than ending EU payments adding 0.3 per cent to GDP.
READ MORE: Labour urges Scottish Tories to back its Brexit bill amendment to protect devolution
Ms Sturgeon said the paper was intended to influence debate ahead of the next phase of Brexit talks on the transition period and future UK-EU trade relations.
It was also aimed at Jeremy Corbyn in the hope he will swing Labour behind single market membership and help force Theresa May to accept it at Westminster.
She said all three scenarios modelled - Norway-style single market membership, a Canada-style free trade agreement believed to be the UK government’s preferred option, and a hard Brexit on World Trade Organisation terms - were worse than staying in the EU.
However retaining single market membership was the “least damaging” approach.
She said: "For the sake of jobs, the economy and the next generation, today we are calling on the UK government to drop its hard Brexit red lines so that Scotland and the UK can stay inside the single market and customs union."
Many arguments in the paper, Scotland’s Place in Europe: People, Jobs and Investment, echo those put forward those in the government’s previous EU paper of December 2016.
However there was a stronger emphasis on migration.
It said: “We are seeking to change the narrative around migration and demonstrate the value it has to Scotland and the UK by detailing evidence of the role EU citizens play in the viability of key sectors of our economy, manufacturing, services and… delivery of public services.”
READ MORE: Michael Matheson right not to minute crunch police meeting, says his predecessor
It pointed out 78 per cent of the 219,000 EU nationals in Scotland are in work, each contributing an average of £34,000 in GDP and £10,400 in government revenue.
Ms Sturgeon said the continued flow of EU migrants to Scotland, which could be slashed by a hard Brexit, was “essential to our future economic prosperity”.
She said: “Growing our population, and particularly our working age population, is perhaps the greatest national challenge that we face.
“Over the past 15 years, EU migration has helped to turn around the long term decline in Scotland’s population and mitigate the impact of an ageing society. Over the next 25 years, our own projected birth rate will not be sufficient to grow our population.
“In the period to 2041, all of our projected population growth will come from inward migration.
“Without that, our population could go into decline and with it our ability to grow our economy and fund our public services.”
She said that “stark reality” meant she had “a duty to make the case for free movement no matter how difficult that is sometimes perceived to be”.
Her Brexit minister Michael Russell said the paper was “a positive case for migration, determinedly going against the Brexiteers’ refusal to acknowledge the vital impact and contribution of EU citizens in our society. Frankly, Scotland cannot do without it.”
Professor Graeme Roy, director of the Fraser of Allander Institute, said: “EU migrants are a key part of the workforce, particularly at a time when Scotland's working age population is projected to decline. Whilst the Scottish Government is right to highlight the risks of leaving the single market, like it or not Brexit – in one form or another – appears certain to happen.
“Given this, it is imperative the Scottish Government also start to outline their practical plans to help Scottish businesses respond to the challenges and maximise any opportunities.”
The Scottish Tories said the report failed to mention EU migration to Scotland increasing since the Brexit vote, and ignored most Scots wanting a UK-wide position on immigration.
READ MORE: Boris on Brexit: £350m a week to NHS was 'underestimate'
MSP Adam Tomkins said: “The SNP government has gone completely over-the-top in its scaremongering here. As the nationalists proved with their independence White Paper, their financial forecasts simply cannot be trusted.
“No one’s doubting that Brexit will pose challenges, but it will bring opportunities too.
“That’s why it’s vital the SNP works with the UK Government to achieve the best Brexit deal.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel