NICOLA Sturgeon’s high-profile push to keep the UK in the single market after Brexit has been dismissed by the Tories as a sham to whip up support for independence.
Scottish leader Ruth Davidson also claimed the First Minister’s latest analysis would not persuade voters who had grown increasingly tired of the SNP’s drive for another referendum.
“When she says Brexit, people hear the word independence,” Ms Davidson said.
Ms Sturgeon yesterday said UK single market membership would be the “number one priority” for the Scottish Government when phase two of the UK-EU Brexit talks begin in March.
She said she would make the case for it “more loudly than ever” in the coming weeks.
A new Scottish Government analysis predicts a hard Brexit on WTO rules would cut Scottish GDP by £2263 per capita by 2030, £1575 more per capita than a soft Brexit.
Hard Brexit also sees the biggest cuts to foreign investment and real disposable incomes.
Ms Sturgeon said the figures showed why Theresa May should stand up to her right wing and back a soft Brexit - and why Jeremy Corbyn should get off the fence and back one too.
The First Minister said: “Keeping the Tory party together in an uneasy truce cannot and must not be a more important consideration and aspiration for the UK Government than the job prospects, living standards and opportunities for this and future generations.”
However speaking after meeting the Prime Minister in London, Ms Davidson, a prominent Remainer, said the paper was another part of Ms Sturgeon’s push for independence.
She said: “Since the Brexit vote I have been here and elsewhere trying to make Brexit work for Scottish businesses whereas she is trying to use it as a lever to break up the UK. That’s sad.
“We don’t want a no-deal Brexit. We want to have the best opportunities for Scottish businesses to trade abroad and that’s what Phase Two of Brexit negotiations is about.”
She said Ms Sturgeon professing to want the best outcome for the UK lacked credibility.
“Everybody listening knows that is a UK she does not want to exist in the future and that’s a difficulty for her. When she says Brexit, people hear the word independence.”
Scottish Secretary David Mundell said Ms Sturgeon’s paper failed to acknowledge Scotland's trade with the rest of the UK was four times as big as its exports to the continental EU.
“At the weekend, Nicola Sturgeon made it clear her real priority is holding a second independence referendum in Scotland, not getting a good deal as we leave the EU.”
Labour MSP Neil Findlay, who has advised Mr Corbyn not to take a definitive position on Brexit until a deal becomes clearer, said: “Labour will get on with fighting for the best possible deal for the whole of the UK while respecting the result of the EU referendum; unlike the SNP, who seem never to accept the result of any referendum."
Scottish LibDem MP Christine Jardine said the Scottish Government paper was “useful” and urged Labour to join a growing consensus on single market membership.
She added: “The Scottish Tories especially need to make their voices heard on behalf of their constituents rather than meekly following Theresa May off the cliff.”
Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer said the paper confirmed Brexit would be “devastating”.
He said: “Full access to the single market is clearly the least damaging option for both Scotland and the rest of the UK so it is disappointing to see Scottish Labour refuse to join us in arguing for this and instead essentially choosing to back the Tories' jobs-destroying Hard Brexit."
John Edward, of the pro-Remain Open Britain group, said the paper underlined the importance of the single market and customs union to the Scottish economy.
He said: “The Government in Westminster needs to wake up to the fact that Scotland would be worse off under any other scenario. Scotland's economic future is best served by preserving the closest possible ties to the EU, the UK's largest trading partner."
STUC General Secretary Grahame Smith said the paper made “sobering reading” and urged the UK government to “get real” about the impact of hard Brexit on workers.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel