Labour leadership contender Owen Smith has been accused of being unfit for high office after he suggested Islamic State (IS) would have to be brought into peace talks to end the Syrian civil war.
In the latest leadership debate, Mr Smith said that "all of the actors" involved in the conflict would have to be brought into the negotiations if there was to be a successful conclusion to the conflict.
His comments sparked an outcry, with one Conservative member of the Commons Defence Committee - former Army officer Johnny Mercer - saying they showed his "unfitness for leadership".
A spokesman for Jeremy Corbyn said the remarks were "hasty and ill-considered".
In contrast to Mr Smith, the Labour leader insisted that there could be no place for the terror group - also referred to as Isil, Isis or Daesh - at the negotiating table.
Asked by presenter Victoria Derbyshire in the BBC televised debate whether IS should be included in peace talks, Mr Smith referred to his time as a special adviser to Northern Ireland secretary Paul (now Lord) Murphy to argue that all parties to the conflict should be involved.
"Ultimately all solutions to these sorts of international crises do come about through dialogue so eventually, if we are to try and solve this, all of the actors do need to be involved.
"But at the moment Isil are clearly not interested in negotiating," he said.
Asked the same question, Mr Corbyn said: "They are not going to be round the table. No."
Mr Mercer said: "Owen Smith's suggestion that we should get Isis 'round the table' demonstrates his unfitness for leadership.
"Everyone knows negotiation is far more desirable than violence in any conflict, but to suggest it in this case is to entirely misunderstand and fail to grasp the challenge posed by Daesh.
"His desperate attempts to out-Corbyn Jeremy Corbyn have led him to the view that barbaric murderers who behead journalists and lynch homosexuals are now the sort of people that we should negotiate with."
A spokesman for Mr Smith later made clear that he believed there could be no negotiation with IS unless they "renounce violence, cease all acts of terror and commit themselves to a peaceful settlement".
"Owen's experience of helping to bring about peace in Northern Ireland is that eventually all parties who truly believe in delivering peace have to be around the table.
"In the Middle East at the moment that clearly doesn't include - and may never include - Daesh," the spokesman said.
Much of the debate was dominated by accusations that Mr Corbyn had failed to crack down on anti-Semitic and misogynistic abuse within the party.
One young Labour supporter in the studio audience said she would "feel more comfortable" going to a Conservative Party conference and saying she was a Labour supporter than going to a Labour conference and saying she supported Mr Smith.
Mr Corbyn insisted he had repeatedly made clear that abuse had no place in the party and that the rules were being tightened to deal with the issue.
"I have dealt with very strongly and very robustly any complaints about abuse. It has no place in any political party. I have made absolutely clear that any kind of abuse is totally unacceptable in any form," he said.
However Mr Smith said they should be "deeply ashamed" that the party was mired in controversy about its attitude towards women and Jewish people and added that Mr Corbyn had "just not seemed bothered enough by it".
"Lots of my female MP colleagues feel Jeremy wasn't supportive enough. Lots of the Jewish MP colleagues feel Jeremy wasn't quick enough to condemn anti-Semitic abuse," he said.
"We are the Labour Party and we are having a debate on national television about anti-Semitism and misogyny within the Labour Party and that should make us all deeply ashamed."
At the end of the debate, the majority of undecideds among the audience - which was made up of Labour members, supporters and potential supporters - indicated they would back Mr Corbyn for the leadership.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel