The UK Government admitted wanting to trade the only man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing for oil, according to a former Scottish minister.
Kenny MacAskill, who controversially freed Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi, said that he was told by then Justice Secretary Jack Straw that commercial interests were at the heart of a prisoner transfer agreement with Libya.
Mr MacAskill also admitted for the first time that the Scottish Government tried to secure its own deal over Megrahi.
Read more: Megrahi family back new bid to clear his name
In a new book he says that he and former First Minister Alex Salmond demanded concessions from the UK Government in return for not making a fuss.
These included the devolution of firearms legislation and a curb on lawsuits from former prisoners forced to ‘slop-out’ using buckets in their cells.
But their attempts proved unsuccessful.
Mr MacAskill also admits he decided to release Megrahi in part to avoid reprisals if he died on Scottish soil.
And argues that Libya, Syria, Iran and Palestinian terrorists were behind the bombing, in revenge for the downing of an Iran Air flight by a US naval ship in July 1988.
All 259 people on board and 11 on the ground where killed when a Pan-Am airliner exploded over Lockerbie in 1988.
Dr Jim Swire, whose daughter Flora was one of those who died, said: "I have no doubt that they (the UK Government) were trying to what has been revealed by Kenny MacAskill, and that is to secure oil reserves in Libya for BP through the agreement of the prisoner transfer.
Read more: "I am not guilty" - Megrahi's dying words to his family
"It was all orchestrated for commercial reasons."
He added: "I am pleased to see Mr MacAskill outline his view on who was really responsible for the Lockerbie bombing, as it is clear to me it was carried out by the Iranians and Palestinian factions in response to the downing of an Iranian airbus by the USS Vincennes in 1988."
But Robert Black, the architect of the Camp Zeist trial which convicted Megrahi, said that nowhere in the extracts of the book published in the Sunday Times was there mention of the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission’s findings on six grounds that the conviction might have amounted to a miscarriage of Justice.
In The Lockerbie Bombing: The Search For Justice, to be published later this month, Mr MacAskill accuses the UK Government of signing a "Faustian Pact" as part of the ‘deal in the desert’ between Tony Blair and Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi in 2007.
Mr MacAskill writes that in a later telephone call: "He [Straw] ... told me that the Libyans would not accept a PTA (Prison Transfer Arrangement) that specifically excluded Megrahi... he then went on to explain the crux of the matter as he saw it, which was British interests. A commercial deal for development of Libyan oil and other resources in the south of that country was of potentially huge financial benefit. The UK was very eager to secure the deal for BP, but it was dependent on the PTA”.
The PTA deal went ahead.
Read more: Megrahi WAS guilty of Lockerbie atrocity, says Scotland's top law officer
But as it was being agreed Megrahi was diagnosed with terminal prostate cancer and freed on compassionate grounds in 2009.
He died in Libya three years later.
Mr Straw rejected MacAskill's comments as "highly embroidered”.
Mr Salmond said that his government "played the whole thing with a straight bat from start to finish".
A spokesman for BP said the company had no comment on the UK government's actions or discussions.
An SNP spokesman said that Mr Megrahi's release was on medical grounds alone.
“Political , economic and diplomatic considerations played no part in the SNP Government's decision.
"The same cannot be said of the UK Labour Government, which cosied up to Gaddafi and his regime when Jack Straw was in charge of the Foreign Office.”
A spokesman for the Scottish Conservatives said that if Mr MacAskill thinks he's solved the crime “he should be going to the police instead of the press”.
He added: "People will be suspicious that this is a sacked justice secretary trying to recover his reputation from the premature release of the Lockerbie bomber which, even by his standards, was an absolute farce.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel