KEZIA Dugdale has warned against underestimating the
“populist nationalism” of those backing Brexit as she drew parallels with the arguments made by supporters of Scottish independence in the 2014 referendum.
The Scottish Labour leader pointed to symmetries in the
arguments of the two campaigns as she launched Labour In for
Scotland alongside Labour In for Britain chair Alan Johnson.
She said the EU referendum gives her party the opportunity to regroup following the “painful defeat” of coming third behind the Tories in last week’s Holyrood election.
Labour will make the positive case for the EU in the face of the “confusion” of nationalists and the “civil war” in the Tory Party, she said.
Addressing supporters in Edinburgh, Ms Dugdale said: “We are Scotland’s internationalist party. We believe in solidarity beyond borders. We believe that sharing sovereignty makes us all stronger, wealthier and safer. We believe in Scotland’s place in the UK.
“For those of us who campaigned in the Scottish referendum, many of the arguments from those campaigning for Brexit are eerie echoes of those we heard two years ago from some of those campaigning to leave the UK.
“We defeated those arguments two years ago, but in doing so we learned that populist nationalism should never be underestimated.
“We know that even faced with the overwhelming weight of evidence, it refuses to concede anything to reasoned argument.
“So in this debate we must win the arguments that appeal to the head, but we remember that they have to be combined with a story that reaches people’s hearts.”
Ms Dugdale said that in some of the arguments made by Brexiteers, the “playbook” of the Scottish referendum is being brought out again.
She added: “If we believe of ourselves that we are as a nation in Scotland more pro-European than our neighbours across the UK, perhaps we have a greater responsibility on us in Scotland to make the positive case for Europe.
“And actually I wish the SNP would do more of this, becauseall I’ve heard them do so far is be really negative about how negative the European campaign has been rather than set out the arguments from their perspective about why we should remain as part of the EU.
“I think there’s a challenge for the SNP with the strength of public will that they have behind them, to use that public will to make the case for Europe in Scotland and across the UK.”
Mr Johnson added: “I think there is a distinctly Scottish case as there is a distinct Welsh case. You can keep your national identity, this is really the nub of the issue.
“I think that’s where there’s a kind of parallel perhaps with the Scottish referendum, that you can keep your nationality, you can keep your identity and be part of something bigger.”
Mr Johnson began his speech with a ringing endorsement of Ms Dugdale’s leadership, telling those presentsaying: “When times are tough you need the best of leadership qualities – there is no better leader in the Labour Party than Kezia Dugdale.”
A recent Survation poll put the Remain vote in Scotland at 76 per cent, while the Scottish Chambers of Commerce said 68 per cent of business people would vote to stay in.
But Mr Johnson warned: “We can take nothing for granted, there can be no room for complacency in this campaign when so much is at stake. This is a once and for all decision.”
Responding to Ms Dugdale’s comments on Twitter, SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon said: “Can’t Lab do anything any more without having a go at the SNP? We’re already making positive case – hope they join us.”
A SNP spokesman said: “Kezia Dugdale stood shoulder-to-shoulder with the Tories in the referendum despite the obvious risk that a No vote could lead to Scotland being dragged out of Europe against our will. The idea that the inclusive, positive Yes campaign can be compared to Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson’s campaign lacks any credibility. Kezia Dugdale should focus her energy making a positive case for Scotland to remain in the EU.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel