The Scottish public should be given the power to propose a second independence referendum rather than having one imposed upon them by a political party, according to Scottish Green co-convener Patrick Harvie.
The pro-independence party has proposed a "citizens' initiative" to allow ordinary voters to start a legally enforcible petition for a second referendum.
The terms and threshold of such a petition have yet to be decided, and a Scottish Green spokesman acknowledged that the policy could also open the door to a rival petition to halt a second referendum.
The SNP has not ruled out proposing a second referendum in its next Holyrood manifesto, but Mr Harvie said it should be up to the people, not political parties.
The Scottish Greens are holding their biggest ever conference at the Clyde Auditorium in Glasgow, after seeing their membership surge from 1,200 to over 9,000 following the No vote in September 2014.
In his keynote speech to conference, Mr Harvie said: "The question of independence may well be put again, but let's say that the people of Scotland are in charge of that.
"We propose a citizens' initiative so that it is the public who say when they are ready for that question to be put, not political parties carving up a deal behind closed doors."
The party hopes to surpass its previous electoral peak of seven MSPs next year, and once again be in a position to influence Scottish Government policy as it did under the first SNP minority-led parliament.
He added: "What a year we have had, it's been extraordinary.
"The membership of the Scottish Green Party had been growing substantially through the European (election) campaign, but the incredible surge in membership that came on the back of the (independence) referendum was bewildering.
"Last year we were turning people away from our conference, it was so frustrating.
"Our vote went up in every single constituency."
Mr Harvie acknowledged that Scotland faces an in/out referendum on the European Union before the question of Scottish independence can be put again.
He said: "We cannot permit the right wing, the hostile, the divisive rhetoric of austerity, the absurd fanatic ideology of the free market to define both yes and no in that referendum.
"In what must count as one of the most despicable speech I have ever heard from a political party conference, Theresa May showed just how willing the Tories are to lie and blame some of the most vulnerable people in our society for the pressures that they themselves are creating.
"The lie that it is immigrants or refugees or asylum seekers that put pressure on our public services and infrastructure.
"What an outright despicable lie. It is the UK Government themselves, by undermining those services and robbing the country of investment, that is putting pressure on them."
Mr Harvie contrasted the Tories' consistent "right wing" message with the mixed messages he sees coming from other political parties.
"At least they're not asking you to vote for a pig in a poke", he said, in a clear allusion to Lord Ashcroft's allegations about the youthful hijinks of Prime Minister David Cameron.
He welcomed the SNP's recent moratorium on underground coal gasification, but questioned their commitment to environmental policies, observing that Energy Minister Fergus Ewing only gets a "fire in his eyes" when he's talking about the continuing viability of Scotland's oil industry.
He also called for a property market that benefits those looking for a home rather than "those who can make a fast buck with a few back-to-back deals - naming no names", alluding to the police investigation into property transactions involving a solicitor linked to suspended SNP MP Michelle Thomson.
Turning to Labour, he said: "It's interesting to see a Labour leader who probably agrees with us on more than he agrees with his own parliamentary party.
"It's curious, and there will be many people in the Labour party who sense that hope and optimism in their own party and they have a chance to turn that tanker around.
"But it remains to be seen whether they are going to be able to do that against a might of party machine that is already plotting against him."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article