THE UK surveillance watchdog has finished its report into allegations Police Scotland unlawfully spied on journalists’ sources.
However, Holyrood’s Justice Committee has been told that a final determination cannot be made as a special Commissioner for spying legislation is not currently in post.
Since March 25th, police forces have been required to get judicial approval before using the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) to flush out a reporter’s source.
The law change was pushed through following human rights concerns over police officers using the legislation in this way on hundreds of occasions.
In July, the Interception of Communications Commissioner’s Office (IOCCO) announced that two unnamed forces had breached the new Code of Practice.
The Sunday Herald, the Herald’s sister newspaper, revealed that Police Scotland was one of the transgressors.
However, the single force and the Scottish Government have refused to comment on the grounds that the IOCCO was continuing its investigation into the breaches.
The Justice Committee expressed a desire to launch a probe of its own and wrote to the IOCCO seeking clarification of when its report would be issued.
In response, the IOCCO said “historically” its inquiries took between three and six months.
Committee convener Christine Grahame said, if the allegations are true, she wanted to “publicly hold the body responsible to account as soon as practicably possible”.
In another letter to the Committee, published today, IOCCO head Joanna Cavan said the watchdog had completed its investigations and conclusions have been prepared for the Commissioner.
However, she added that a Commissioner was not in post and so the matter could not be progressed, a delay she described as “incredibly frustrating”.
She added: “We do expect this to be resolved very shortly - within a matter of weeks. At present however our hands are tied as until we have a determination from the Commissioner we cannot complete the inquiry.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here