I READ your article on Professor John McKendrick’s study on the geography of poverty in Scotland where he highlighted the struggles some families have in the wealthiest areas of Scotland, with both sadness and resignation (“Even rich areas have high child poverty”, The Herald, March 15).
I worked as the headteacher in both Dunblane High School and Linlithgow Academy and witnessed evidence of his work on a daily basis.
I worked within a structure that used the most blunt instruments, like free school meal percentages, to allocate funds to support deprived locations but most importantly, not struggling individual families.
What mattered for the education and children services managers was the percentages, not the humans. Being poor in Dunblane and Linlithgow was a most isolating experience for children. From their first day in education their confidence suffered, and their attainment suffered. They were a huge minority without a voice.
Facing the difficulties of financial hardship is heart-breaking in any area but if you live without community attachment and support it is doubly hard.
Hopefully Professor McKendrick’s study will awaken the Government and councils to the fact that we do not live in homogenously rich and poor areas.
I worked and tried my best to change things in my own way but sadly failed and that still bothers me. For all the child-centred philosophy, policies and posters that adorn school corridors we still focus on the numerical averages and not the individual families.
David A MacKenzie,
12 Torridon Place, Kinross.
THE research on child poverty undertaken by Glasgow Caledonian University makes clear that no assumptions can be made; Professor John McKendrick and his team found intense child poverty existed even in areas of Scotland considered to be affluent.
It is totally unacceptable that any child, wherever they live, should have to cope with the miseries of poverty, and Professor McKendrick’s report confirms the stark realities of life for growing numbers of families in Scotland.
We know that there is an increase in the use of food banks, we know there is “summer hunger” facing children whose main meals are provided at school, and who, instead of welcoming school holidays have been found distraught at the end of term, wondering how and when they will be fed.
It is an abomination that in 21st century, oil-rich Scotland, there are children going to bed hungry, children who have few toys and who have never enjoyed a day at the seaside, let alone a holiday. And one of the most corrosive things about poverty is that it can destroy a person’s sense of worth and self-confidence, for life.
The Scottish Government has protected more than half a million Scottish households from UK Government cuts to council tax benefit, and the Child Poverty Bill which was passed by Holyrood at the end of last year is an important step forward.
The Baby Boxes, increasing free child care to help mothers back to work, free school meals and the Scottish Welfare Fund are all helpful tools, but Professor McKendrick points out that the “most powerful tools” for tackling poverty lies with the UK Government, which sets tax and welfare payments.
Scotland needs full control over tax and welfare, because while Westminster holds the purse strings, child poverty will never be ended by the UK Government.
Our children are our future, and the future of Scotland’s children should be in Scotland’s hands.
Ruth Marr,
99 Grampian Road,
Stirling.
I FOUND the reported comments by Mark Priestley, professor of education at Stirling University as insightful as they are refreshingly candid (“Warning over Government’s ‘narrow focus’ on closing attainment gap”, The Herald, March 16).
He reminds us that “ the school is only a very small part of the lives of children”.
For many young people, the weighty target of studying, never mind passing, around five Higher Grade subjects by the time they leave school must seem an overwhelming and unrealistic expectation of them.
Far from being an attainable challenge in their formative years, pupils will often appear to be so demotivated they give up hope entirely, staring despairingly at a precipice to climb with sometimes no safety rope from a dysfunctional home.
I view the real issue emerging from The Herald exam league table published in the same edition (“Schools from across west of Scotland dominate Herald’s exam league tables”, The Herald, March 16), is that schools are only judged annually on certain pupils’ attainment in leaving qualifications, usually leading to university entrance. I consider it more helpful that schools should be required to assist all senior pupils to format a personal development plan extending up to around the age of 26 and then, how incrementally successful the plan was could be assessed.
Achieving Highers to get into a university is not an end in itself. Personal targets have to be adaptable to changing opportunities, “what if’s” and circumstances such as for example, an early marriage/family, redundancy and changes in employment demands.
Young people can both under and over-estimate their potential in any field of activity or study. It is almost impossible to accurately predict human potential but all young people should be able to leave school with a flexible route plan charting alternative ways ahead such that they feel they are a success in life.
All our educational agencies seem to me to be lacking a joined-up and effective after-sales service if all we can celebrate is the crème de la crème.
Schools must find it a little difficult to remind pupils that successful people like Richard Branson, Simon Cowell, Lord Alan Sugar and the broadcaster Jon Snow all did rather poorly at school by the attainment standards we seem to now only judge school success by.
One thing is certain to me, however. The schools which do not appear in the league table of so-called “top schools” should not think any less of themselves.They are very likely to appear on any table of success in the added value they have contributed to pupils for their chances of success in the difficult world they often live in.
Bill Brown,
46 Breadie Drive,
Milngavie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel