FURTHER to the letter from Charles McQueen (July 3) regarding the testing of products used on Grenfell Tower, there is indeed a system of classification and testing under the Construction Products Directive. This was introduced as long ago as 1988. Member states are required to nominate what were then described as “notified bodies” to the European Commission. These are now called Technical Assessment Bodies and consist of organisations accredited by the UK Government as being suitable for testing construction products prior to selling into the single market.
A manufacturer can ask one of these bodies to provide a technical assessment to determine if it meets the recognised standards as set by the European Commission. If it conforms then the manufacturer can affix a CE mark to the product. In so doing the manufacturer is declaring that it is legally compliant for selling throughout the EEA and according to the commission, it has been “assessed to meet high safety, health, and environmental protection requirements”. However the commission then warns that this “does not indicate that a product has been approved as safe by the EU or by another authority”. In my view that immediately raises a question as to the validity of any CE marking.
Manufacturers are expected to indicate that they take responsibility for the conformity of the product with its declared performance. If the product fails and this results in a death, then both the manufacturer and the testing body can be sued. For that reason the latter is required to carry civil liability insurance to cover this. Sub-contracting to another more specialist body is allowed, but it is illegal to sub-contract further.
On BBC Newsnight the week before last it was claimed that they had “uncovered” the identity of such a testing company for one of the products used in Grenfell Tower. This is scarcely new. The information is readily available online because the commission is obliged to keep a public record of all notified bodies.
Kirsty Wark seemed surprised that it was a private company. The guidance issued with the original directive states clearly that “notified bodies are and must remain third parties independent of their clients and other interested parties”. The testing body cannot therefore be connected to a manufacturer or an arm of government. That’s the whole point about being impartial and that’s why they are mainly private companies.
The testing bodies in the UK have to be checked and accredited by the Department of Communities before notification to the commission. If a testing body is found to have wrongly tested a product and is therefore culpable in a death, then there is a possibility – albeit remote – that the relevant Government minister could also be held to be culpable. It is therefore imperative that the inquiry should examine the system of product testing and certification. The scale and extent of failure so far identified indicates that the system is not working and that every building type could be affected.
Robert Menzies,
2 Burnbrae Gardens, Falkirk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here