MOST of us suffer from a bout of food poisoning at some point, and would agree that it is a thoroughly miserable affair. Thousands of working days are lost every year because of it, thousands of hours of doctors’ time used up.
For children, pregnant women and the elderly, of course, food poisoning can be a very serious - even fatal - business indeed.
Poor food hygiene is to blame for the vast majority of poisoning cases, which means takeaways, restaurants, cafes and hotels should be doing all they can to ensure everything that leaves their kitchens is safe to eat.
According to data collected by government agency Food Standards, however, all too often this is simply not the case. Recent research shows that in Edinburgh almost 40 per cent of fast food joints and a quarter of restaurants failed food hygiene checks, the second highest failure rate in the UK.
Following this, Food Standards Scotland has confirmed it is considering using the law to make food establishments display hygiene ratings on their premises and websites so customers can decide whether to eat there.
Perhaps not surprisingly, some in the food industry are less than keen on the idea, particularly since research shows half of customers would turn away from the doors of establishments with a poor hygiene rating.
But surely consumers have every right to make an informed choice about where they eat? And surely businesses that take food hygiene seriously have nothing to fear from such a scheme – indeed, they are likely to prosper as customers reward them for cleanliness.
Those businesses not up to scratch, meanwhile, would have little choice but to improve, and a mechanism could be built into the scheme to reward this.
Publicly visible hygiene standards in our hospitals helped bring about a dramatic reduction in infections. There is no reason why a similar strategy could not see positive results in our food businesses.
The authorities should now work closely with the food and hospitality industry to make it happen.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here