FOR a school to be successful it must have one vital ingredient above all others: a headteacher who does her or his best by and for the pupils and staff under their charge. Leadership entails challenging each young person to be the best they can, regardless of background or ability.
Perhaps Education Secretary John Swinney had these qualities in mind when he announced plans, out for consultation, to give headteachers more power and direct funding to support pupils from disadvantaged areas. The National Parent Forum of Scotland, in its response to the plans, questions whether they would raise standards. It also warns that they could worsen headteacher shortages as leaders would come under greater pressure.
Also, the plan to create educational regions could add to the bureaucratic burden on schools, parents warn; this at a time when the burden needs to be eased so that the focus can be placed on raising attainment, particularly among young people from poorer areas.
The forum’s submission is a valuable contribution to the debate about how best education should be managed and schools led to raise standards and give young people the best life chances regardless of background. The most effective headteachers would probably make the best use of new opportunities (it is no coincidence that their representative bodies welcome Mr Swinney’s plans) but they would need material support. Filling headteacher vacancies is becoming increasingly difficult in present circumstances without making the job even more challenging.
There is room for improvement in education, even allowing for legitimate reservations about the robustness of recent national and international assessments of attainment levels that did not show Scotland in the best light. Mr Swinney has tests to pass before he can make a convincing case for the plans he has outlined that are dividing opinion.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here