THIS week saw the anniversary of the Nagasaki bomb (August 9). A few of us went to Rhu Narrows near Faslane and sent out floating Japanese lanterns in silent remembrance of the many thousands that died in that horrendous detonation.
There might have been some justification if it had been necessary to kill all these people to shorten the war or save soldiers lives but the Japanese were already trying to negotiate a surrender. That bomb was exploded over a city as a live experimental test of the results on real people.
We, here in the UK, maintain a nuclear arsenal, not for any real defensive reasons, but to pretend that we are still one of the big boys and to keep our seat as a permanent member of the UN Security Council. It is a weapon that we will never use under any circumstances; the Americans have a veto on its use and there are no conceivable targets where its use could be justified.
In the meantime, to support Trident, our conventional defences are stripped bare: we have no maritime surveillance so that we do not know what is happening in the North Sea; our army is cut to no more than a token force that could not again support the simultaneous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that we were involved in a few years back; we have built two aircraft carriers with no useful planes to fly from them and one of these will be immediately mothballed because we do not have the resources to man and run it.
These are some of the reasons that an independent Scottish government will reject Trident replacement and invest a sensible amount in building smaller but more coherent armed forces for real protection, based on Faslane with warships built on the Clyde.
DS Blackwood,
1 Douglas Drive East, Helensburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel