In dealing with the subject of admitting women to golf clubs, readers might be tempted to check their calendars to make sure it is 2016 and not some peculiar year from a decade long past.
Today, the Honourable Company of Edinburgh Golfers, based at Muirfield, East Lothian, announces the result of a ballot on admitting women members. A sizeable lobby opposes the move, which requires a two-thirds majority. In a letter to members, the “No” campaigners laud the idea of “traditional resistance to change” and cite the “inevitable risk” that admitting women members would entail. Pity the poor men of Muirfield: subject to yet another variety of Project Fear.
Meanwhile, on the west coast, the Royal Troon Golf Club has been consulting its members prior to a similar vote taking place in the summer. Here, lately, there have been positive noises, with the club captain saying the institution should reflect “the modern society in which we exist”.
In Scotland, nowhere is modern society reflected more clearly than in our political leaders, with three women heading their respective parties. Nicola Sturgeon, Ruth Davidson and Kezia Dugdale have all suggested they would boycott the Open, hosted this year by Royal Troon, if the men-only rule isn’t ditched. They highlight the absurdity whereby women can run a country but cannot join a golf club.
Reverencing the past is not an ignoble attitude. But clinging to it leads to decay and ridicule. The resistance at Muirfield and Troon inspires images of sideboard-sporting men, reeking of Old Spice and wearing the latest in flared slacks, sauntering into the club bar for a bottle of Blue Nun and a packet of Capstan cigarettes from a barman reading Men Only magazine as he whistles a hit from Showaddywaddy.
This is unfortunate. It is time for these otherwise great golf clubs to join the 21st century. Time for Muirfield and Royal Troon to man up and admit some honourable company.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel