I WAS fortunate to be of an age to be able to access squash through pay and play, which was available in most towns. My friends and I, having sampled this wonderful sport, continued to play the game throughout a significant proportion of our adult lives. Some of us joined clubs but many were happy just to play regularly with friends and family. Perhaps those who did not join clubs were less considered by sporting authorities but at least they existed.
Now we find that according to Sportscotland and the governing bodies there was a post-2014 Commonwealth Games legacy of an increase in participation in squash of 20 per cent. This was then reduced to 10 per cent when the figure was challenged. Obviously this is the time to increase availability of courts for new players to experience the game. However, the reality is the exact opposite.
The courts at Largs are closed to construct a national parasports centre, which incidentally will further isolate these athletes from other athletes. Meadowbank in Edinburgh is to be redeveloped without any provision of squash courts (“Future for Edinburgh’s field of dreams in balance”, The Herald, January. The farce of the non-retention of the show court used during the 2014 games is so absurd that one has to ask if anyone is willing to admit to being responsible for this crass decision.
This must serve as a warning to participants in sports that there is no guarantee that your sport will not fall out of favour with Sportscotland. Given its focus on elite, medal-winning sports at the expense of grassroots participation and the apparent total lack of Government oversight, one has to ask if this organisation is fit for purpose.
David Stubley,
22 Templeton Crescent, Prestwick.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel