A Scotswoman whose husband is trapped in Syria has pleaded with the Home Office to give them a quick decision on his visa application.
Christine Gilmore, 33, from Edinburgh, fears her husband, Ziad Arabi-Katbi, will be killed before the decision is made.She said yesterday she had been unable to contact him for 24 hours.
"Every time I can't speak to him for more than a couple of hours it means something has happened," she said. "The last time [he was out of contact] happened he was hit by shrapnel and had to go to hospital. Last week he was driving to see his mum and was shot by a sniper. He went to the garage to get the car repaired and he was taken by security services for questioning.I know how many times he could have been killed."
The PhD student, who used to work for the LibDems in Scotland, met her husband in Damascus in 2010 where she was studying Arabic as part of an MA. The plan was to marry in Scotland then settle in the Syrian capital.
But when the revolution came, Ms Gilmore was forced to leave. Lawyers advised a passage to the UK would be easier if they were married. So they travelled to Beirut in December last year to marry and applied for settlement.
They spent months gathering documents but her husband's lawyer was killed in a car bomb and the papers went astray. It was difficult to get hold of new papers because government officials and clerks had stopped working. The conflict meant the courts in Damascus were often closed and the first application was rejected.
They submitted the final two additional documents asked for two months ago. The British embassy in Amman has his passport while his application is reviewed so he cannot currently go anywhere.
They still await a response."I felt they were splitting hairs," said Ms Gilmore. "We provided evidence that he had passed the English language test set at the British Council with distinction. But then they said they wanted proof that he entered the exam room.
"I provided evidence I met the financial requirements, with savings running into tens of thousands of pounds and evidence of my student income, but because my bank is online they said my printed and stamped bank statements didn't constitute sufficient evidence."
"They now have these additional two pieces of information but have left us waiting. Our house is a stone's throw from the army headquarters. They are planning to drop bombs on my husband and yet they are taking more than two months to read two simple pieces of paper."
She says many of the families of British citizens were evacuated from Syria 18 months ago.
"I just want an answer," she said. "While we're waiting his passport is being held by the British embassy. He can't go anywhere - he can't At least if we knew the answer was no then he could get his passport back and make an application elsewhere before the city is bombed. If my British citizenship and indeed British values mean anything, I beg my government to help get my husband out of there."
UKBA statistics show that only two settlement visa have been issued to Syrians in the past two years.
A Home Office spokeswoman said: "All visa applications are considered on their individual merits and in line with the immigration rules.
"Mr Arabi Katbi's original application was refused in May because he did not supply the necessary evidence to support his application. He did not exercise his right of appeal.
"A fresh application was submitted in July and this application is currently being processed and like all visa application it is being assessed in line with immigration rules."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article