PASSENGERS on Glasgow's Subway will face fines of up to £1000 for taking photographs on trains or within stations under proposals that have provoked a backlash from business leaders, amateur photographers and civil liberties campaigners.
Strathclyde Partnership for Transport – which runs the ageing Subway system – is to ban taking photographs, filming or making audio recordings as part of an overhaul of by-laws dating back to 1980.
Under the proposals, which were put out to consultation earlier this week, filming and photography on trains or in any of the 15 stations on the network would be illegal and lumped in the same category as drinking alcohol, being disorderly or interfering with emergency equipment.
The only exception would be if a passenger had written permission from SPT, carried this with them and showed it to any Subway officers on request.
A breach of any of the proposed by-laws would result in a "level 3" penalty – set by Scottish ministers as a fine of up to £1000. By-laws currently in place on the Subway specify a number of fines, the highest of which is £200.
A spokeswoman for the transport authority said the proposed by-law changes reflected existing policies and was required for security reasons.
But it provoked an outcry from politicians and business leaders who warned banning photographs would affect the thousands of people who take pictures of friends while travelling to the city centre.
Stuart Patrick, chief executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce, said it sent the "wrong message" to tourists.
"The last thing I want to see is a tourist arrested for taking a picture of the Clockwork Orange. If SPT has concerns over safety, I'd like to see them tell us which photos are safe and which are unsafe," he said.
Civil liberties campaigner Geraint Bevan said: "It sounds preposterous and completely unenforceable, given so many people have cameras on their phones."
The rules would be stricter than regulations covering the UK's railway stations, which prevent flash photography – so as not to distract train drivers – but allow other pictures to be taken if they are not sold.
Guidance published on the website of Network Rail, which owns Britain's railway stations, says photos can be taken but warns against putting tripod legs near the edges of platforms or in the way of passengers.
The ban has also provoked anger among photographers. Michael Pritchard, director general of the Royal Photographic Society, told Amateur Photographer magazine: "Photography is being targeted in a blanket way that is illogical and offers no benefit to the public or to transport staff.
"As most people carry a camera phone, the proposed by-law would be impossible to police."
In a statement, SPT said the restrictions were in line with those for any major transport hub, though critics were swift to point out that no such ban exists on London's Underground.
Yesterday a spokeswoman for SPT said the reforms would be made in a "sensible" way.
She added: "The great thing about consultation is that it allows everyone interested in the subject to get involved.
"Security will always be our top priority and safety protocols need to be aligned in a sensible way while considering things like the huge uptake in social media and availability of handheld devices which many of our customers use."
Scottish Conservative transport spokesman Alex Johnstone said: "While there may be safety reasons for this, a blanket ban is an unjustified reaction. The very act of policing a ban like this it would be impossible."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article