RECONNECTING St Andrews to Britain's rail network would create strong demand for train travel and a profitable railway route, a feasibility study has concluded.
Research by Tata Steel Projects has recommended building a station and line spanning nearly five miles between the town and East Coast Main Line at a cost of £71 million, which would enable rail passengers to travel to Dundee in under 20 minutes – much quicker than the journey by road.
Its report, published yesterday, found that profits of up to £1.6m a year would outstrip the operating cost of the railway but that capital funding would be needed to construct it.
The Scottish Government, which last month launched a £30m fund to build new stations and improve existing ones, asked for further research to be undertaken to see if it was viable.
St Andrews has been one of the largest towns in Scotland without direct access to rail travel since 1969 when its branch line was closed as part of the Beeching cuts. The nearest station is five miles away at Leuchars, though campaigners say bus connections are unreliable.
The latest report, which was funded by the St Andrews Rail Link Campaign (Starlink), was welcomed by St Andrews University, whose 8000 students are the only ones in Scotland who do not have a rail station.
Reinstating the old route would be difficult as it would cause disruption to the golf links and part of the station has been used as a car park, the study found.
It instead proposed a route which hugged the A91, concluding that the ensuing rail journeys would see a journey of one hour, 19 minutes to Edinburgh and one hour, 14 minutes in the opposite direction.
A spokeswoman for Government agency Transport Scotland said: "The proposals must be discussed with the local regional transport partnership, SEStran, and a STAG appraisal considering all transport options, not just rail, must be carried out."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article