The subject of a possible invasion of Ukraine by Russia has been a constant topic in the news cycle over the past couple of weeks.
This is because tens of thousands of Russian troops have been amassing on Ukraine's borders, which has caused concern.
Western governments have held talks with Russia to try and find a solution to this activity but US President Joe Biden has warned there is a "distinct possibility" that Russia will commit to invading in the next month, as reported by BBC News.
But why did this all start and what is the history behind the current actions Russia are taking?
What is the timeline of events for the Russia-Ukraine crisis?
Russia placing military equipment and troops near the border of Ukraine first occurred during March and April 2021.
This was the largest mobilisation of forces since Russia annexed Crimea in 2014.
These troops were removed in June after talks were held with the international community, but were back in place in December.
That month Russia also drafted two treaties that contained requests of what is referred to as "security guarantees" which included a legally binding promise that Ukraine would not join NATO.
Additionally, they wanted a reduction in NATO troops and military hardware stationed in Eastern Europe and threatened an unspecified military response if those demands were not met in full.
These requests were rejected by the United States and other members of NATO, and diplomatic talks since then have not eased the tension.
Russia has been warned by Western governments that it will be hit with heavy economic sanctions should it decide to invade Ukraine.
Why does Russia potentially want to invade Ukraine?
The Wall Street Journal reasoned that Russian President Vladimir Putin perhaps wants Ukraine as it used to be part of the Soviet Union before it fell in 1991.
As it directly borders Russia to its east, Putin perhaps wants to reclaim some of Russia's glory which was lost when it relinquished much of its territory back in the 1990s.
Putin has previously described Russians and Ukrainians as “one people, a single whole.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel