One of the US's most influential newspapers has said Scottish independence could lead to "a less stable world".
A Washington Post editorial said Scotland would be "unable to contribute meaningfully to global security" and significantly weaken the UK which it regards as the US's foremost ally.
Independence could destabilise the pound and cost the remainder of the UK its seat on the United Nations Security Council, the newspaper also speculates.
The UK would be able to veto Scotland's entry to the European Union and could lay claim to a third of the North Sea's oil fields, it claims.
The editorial states that Scottish independence is part of a "worrying trend" towards European regional fragmentation, citing separatist movements such as Catalonia in Spain, Flanders in Belgium and Venice in Italy.
"Like small US states, European statelets could command disproportionate representation in EU bodies; today's provincial politicians imagine themselves seated alongside Germany and France at European summits," it says.
"To be sure, a more local government can be more efficient, more democratic and more attuned to citizens' interests. But the more fragmented Europe becomes, the less it will be able to use its collective strength on the global stage, both in military and diplomatic terms.
"Though a weak EU diplomatic corps exists, a bona fide continental military is a distant dream, at best. A weaker Europe means a less stable world, and less leverage for the democracies."
The Washington Post is one of the US's leading daily newspapers, published in the US capital and specialising in political coverage and commentary.
It claims around 20 million readers throughout the US and a further six million around the world.Its editorials represent the views of the paper, as determined through debate among members of the editorial board.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article